NZGames.com Forums
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NZGames.com Forums > General > Open Discussion > The year of rugby
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 1st October 2007, 11:53     #1
fobski
 
So.. to cardiff we roll

but why do i have a sinking feeling about playing france in the quarters

__________________
He sleeps. Sock. Bar of soap. Bang bang bang! Brain damage. Corn field. Gun. *pchew* Funeral
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 12:32     #2
EvilLumpy
 
I'm predicting an AB vs SA final so you're not allowed to have a sinking feeling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 13:06     #3
BtP
 
I'm predicting an AB vs SA final so you're not allowed to have a sinking feeling UNTIL THEN.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 13:24     #4
blynk
 
My main concern is drop goals, And I think it could be a concern for Australia as well.

Its all good going for trys, but if they don't come, and then all of a sudden the other side is down the other end kicking a drop goal, it really adds up. England will definitely employ that tactic, but France will probably do it as well.

It will be the only way we loose this game.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 16:54     #5
caffiend
 
We will thump France. Big time.

I'm starting to wonder if Henry has pulled off an awesome hand of poker. I just can't help feeling that the ABs have been kept in check up until now.

Things might be different against Aussie and then SA; but it was just the realisation when seeing the players on the bench and in the stands for the Romania game that we have not put the form 15 on the field yet; not by a long shot.

I have faith.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is everyone so unhappy these days?
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 18:33     #6
Ard Righ
 
Go the All Blacks winning the coin toss and making France play in the We French Love to Surrender strip
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 18:43     #7
Maulmonk
 
I want NZ to play a tough grinding encounter vs France to prepare us to verse Aussie in the finals. I think previous world cups have taugh us one thing: big margins mean NOTHING
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 21:58     #8
blynk
 
I think the game will be either a really tight one with only a couple of points different (to either side). Or, we will win it by 20+ points
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 22:02     #9
Rocket
 
lol very nice prediction you made there. you what you trying to say is you dont have a clue.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 22:21     #10
Phantom
May contain nuts
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by caffiend
We will thump France. Big time.

I'm starting to wonder if Henry has pulled off an awesome hand of poker. I just can't help feeling that the ABs have been kept in check up until now.

Things might be different against Aussie and then SA; but it was just the realisation when seeing the players on the bench and in the stands for the Romania game that we have not put the form 15 on the field yet; not by a long shot.

I have faith.
Sing is sister! AMEN =D

This is the year
__________________
omgwtf
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 22:48     #11
JERI
 
Tough game or not, I simply can't see the All Blacks losing to the French.
__________________
your intelligence has been insulted.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 23:15     #12
caffiend
 
So here's what I think would be our best team, assuming no injury concerns:

1. Tony Woodcock
2. Keven Mealamu
3. Carl Hayman
4. Chris Jack
5. Ali Williams
6. Jerry Collins
7. Richie McCaw
8. Rodney So'oialo
9. Byron Kelleher
10. Dan Carter
11. Joe Rococoko
12. Luke McAlister
13. Isaia Toeava
14. Doug Howlett
15. Leon MacDonald

Bench:
16. Anton Oliver
17. Neemia Tialata
18. Chris Masoe
19. Keith Robinson
20. Brendon Leonard
21. Conrad Smith
22. Mils Muliaina

The fact that this would still be sitting out players like Mauger, Thorne, Somerville, Ellis, Evans, Sivivatu means (injuries aside) we really do have a shitload of good players to choose from.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is everyone so unhappy these days?

Last edited by caffiend : 1st October 2007 at 23:17.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 03:03     #13
Maulmonk
 
1. Tony Woodcock
2. Anton Oliver
3. Carl Hayman
4. Chris Jack
5. Ali Williams
6. Jerry Collins
7. Richie McCaw
8. Rodney So'oialo
9. Byron Kelleher
10. Dan Carter
11. Joe Rococoko
12. Luke McAlister
13. Mils Muliania
14. Doug Howlett
15. Leon MacDonald

Bench:
16. Kevin Mealamu
17. Neemia Tialata
18. Sione Lauaki
19. Keith Robinson
20. Brendon Leonard
21. Nick Evans
22. Isaia Toeava

My team

Smith hasn't shown enough to warrant a spot.
Lauaki and Mealamu offer the most impact from the bench IMHO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 06:41     #14
darkness
 
I reckon Robinson and Evans are a hairs breath away from being in the first 15.

Robinson has been dominating lineouts and Evans had a blinder of a game against romania. He was everywhere and his kicking was much more consistent that McAlisters
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 08:13     #15
slippers
 
Evans has pretty much cemented a bench spot for the rest of the tournament imho.

Lauaki is gone until the Final - if we make it. Which is good because they really only need him against South Africa anyway.

Id agree with those teams posted above pretty much.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 09:11     #16
Rince
SLUTS!!!!!!!
 
McAlistair off the bench IMO* as an impact player






* And John Hart's as well, apparently
__________________
Slow internet is worse than no internet. It's like putting your penis in once and then being required to make out for 2 hours
--Matt "The Oatmeal" Inman
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 09:39     #17
a-tech
 
Go the ABs - this is where the fun really starts 9am kick off too, sweet time.
__________________
NZ Breakbeat Culture - Bassdrop.co.nz
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 10:01     #18
Boofhead
 
http://www.rugbyworldcup.com/home/ne...pended+matches
Lauaki out for 2 weeks
__________________
What would Brian Boitano do?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 10:55     #19
slippers
 
We only need Lauaki for the Boks anyway. Also - Mcalister is better off the bench imo too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 11:38     #20
pig
 
I dunno why but i feel like the AB's have been holding back in tactics & approach, hopefully they are ready to go.

1. Tony Woodcock
2. Anton Oliver
3. Carl Hayman
4. Chris Jack
5. Ali Williams
6. Jerry Collins
7. Richie McCaw
8. Rodney So'oialo
9. Byron Kelleher
10. Dan Carter
11. Joe Rococoko
12. Luke McAlister
13. Conrad Smith
14. Doug Howlett
15. Mils Muliaina
Bench:
16. Keven Mealamu
17. Greg Somerville
18. Chris Masoe
19. Keith Robinson
20. Brendon Leonard
21. Aaron Mauger
22. Isaia Toeava

They usually start Oliver against the frogs for his scrummaging, i can't see anyone apart from Smith at centre as no-one else has really stepped up.
Hard to choose between Mauger & Evans & Toeava & Sivavatu as the back cover, i would have Mauger in my starting 15 ahead of McAlister this game to give him a chance to find some form but Henry seems to prefer McAlister atm.

Last edited by pig : 2nd October 2007 at 11:39.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 12:38     #21
slippers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pig
I dunno why but i feel like the AB's have been holding back in tactics & approach, hopefully they are ready to go.
They HAVE been holding back in tactics. Kevin Mealamu accidently let it slip the other day in an interview. I'm surprised more people havn't picked up on this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 12:42     #22
slippers
 
IMO the team will be as follows.

1. Woodcock
2. Mealamu
3. Hayman
4. Williams
5. Jack
6. Collins
7. McCaw
8. So'oialo

9. Kelleher

10. Carter
11. Rokocoko
12. McAlister
13. Muliana
14. Howlett
15. McDonald

16. Evans
17. Thorne
18. Sommerville
19. Leonard
20. Oliver
21. Toeava
22. Masoe
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 13:28     #23
xor
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by slippers
They HAVE been holding back in tactics. Kevin Mealamu accidently let it slip the other day in an interview. I'm surprised more people havn't picked up on this.
What did he say?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 13:42     #24
slippers
 
Here is the relivant part of the article......


Quote:
Originally Posted by some article
Mealamu said not every lineout trick had been unveiled so far because the eyes of all their main rivals would be watching.

New tactics would come out when everything was on the line in the knockout phase.

"Teams like Aussie and South Africa, they thrive on that sort of stuff," Mealamu said.

"You can't show everything. You've got to make sure you have something you can go to when you need it in the big games."
Now I know it does say LINEOUT. So he only let it slip that they are holding back in the lineout...however, you'd think that with comments like that its a theme that would be mirrored throughout the whole team.

If you read between the lines - the All Blacks _ARE_ holding something back. This much is obvious in their rotation policy anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 13:53     #25
Kryten
 
Wasn't every lineout throw in the Portugal game exactly the same, purportedly because a) we could and b) why give anything away?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 13:56     #26
untouchable
 
The centre pairing still worries me. McAlister with his stupid little kicks that never work or Mauger who is slightly better tactically but isnt such a force at the line.

Im happy with either Toeava or Muliana at 13 tho.

Conrad smith can fuck right off.
__________________
Teddy Bear Junction, the worst scumhole in the galaxy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 14:16     #27
slippers
 
Yeah Toeava or Muliana I'm happy with also.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 14:29     #28
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by untouchable
The centre pairing still worries me. McAlister with his stupid little kicks that never work or Mauger who is slightly better tactically but isnt such a force at the line.
Amazing, you can swap each name for the other and the sentence still makes just as much sense.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 14:31     #29
untouchable
 
Yeah and therein lies the problem. I wonder if Muliana could play 12.
__________________
Teddy Bear Junction, the worst scumhole in the galaxy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 15:13     #30
pig
 
Im not worried about second five, im pretty happy about either of those guys starting altho i prefer Mauger's experience. I am concerned about centre, especially the way bloody Mortlock has tended to have his way with us in recent times.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 15:39     #31
blynk
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by slippers
They HAVE been holding back in tactics. Kevin Mealamu accidently let it slip the other day in an interview. I'm surprised more people havn't picked up on this.
I've known this since before the cup, where I am sure they said they would not play all their moves until they get past the first round.
It makes sense, why play great moves against the nobodys, that other team can watch and learn.
They may have tested a few things, but there will still be a lot in the goody bag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 16:05     #32
o9
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by untouchable
Yeah and therein lies the problem. I wonder if Muliana could play 12.
I'd like:

10. Evans
12. Carter

Better than McAlister or Mauger, but it'll never happen

Carter is first choice 10 and 12 isn't he?

Last edited by o9 : 2nd October 2007 at 16:08.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 16:20     #33
BtP
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by o9
I'd like:

10. Evans
12. Carter
Better than McAlister or Mauger, but it'll never happen
Carter is first choice 10 and 12 isn't he?
Carter's a tough nut and wouldn't be too bad as a 12... hmmm. Our real options as discussed above combinations of McAlister, Mauger, Toeava, Smith, Mills.

With Leon a competent fullback (hell - Evans is handy there too) it's a safe approach with Mills in at centre. In that case I'd chuck McAlister in for a bit of flair and risk taking. With a cool head either side of him I think he would thrive. At 1st 5 definitely not...

I'd like to say Conrad Smith as 1st choice at 13 but he hasn't really put his hand up with the small opportunities he's had. I like Toeava and to see him at 13 I'd put Mauger in at 12. But even then I don't think this is as strong as the pairing of McAlister and Mills(or Smith).
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 16:26     #34
a-tech
 
Henry and the ABs management arent stupid - they have been planning this for 4 years now, if all the top teams didnt have some tactics saved for the final rounds I would be very suprised.
__________________
NZ Breakbeat Culture - Bassdrop.co.nz
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 16:29     #35
drac0s
 
other teams will have tactics saved as well. the midfield pairing still does seem to be dodgy which i guess is mine and everyone elses concern.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 17:37     #36
caffiend
 
I think Toeava did well at 13 against Romania. Very quietly, and without any flashiness; but he's been fairly solid whenever he's come on in other games too. I'd like to see him in 13 for the France game because that will definitely give him a bit of a try-out against a semi-decent opponent, without being too risky since if he isn't up to par I doubt the French will be able to exploit it with the quality of players around him.

He needs a good test before he goes up against the likes of Mortlock.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is everyone so unhappy these days?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 17:55     #37
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
I'd like to see Carter 10 and Brett 12 next year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 17:57     #38
Ard Righ
 
Everyone here is acting overly paranoid about the centre combinations. Geez do you think the coaches with their 4 years of planning would let the biggest sticking point in All Black RWC history be the fall-down yet again ?

The team has more than enough options to cover centre for whatever team we face. We've got the bulk when needed, and we've got the pace when needed.

Don't stress.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 18:22     #39
untouchable
 
I hope you are right but we havent seen a consistent centre pairing for a long time, so I think everyone is entitled to be a bit unsure.
__________________
Teddy Bear Junction, the worst scumhole in the galaxy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2007, 18:47     #40
blynk
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by untouchable
I hope you are right but we havent seen a consistent centre pairing for a long time, so I think everyone is entitled to be a bit unsure.
Maybe thats one of their tactics. Make it look like we don't have anyone outstanding, but really, Smith and Toeava are just biding their time.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



© Copyright NZGames.com 1996-2024
Site paid for by members (love you guys)