|
18th November 2011, 00:01 | #121 |
Architeuthis
|
I liked the part where fixed_truth went all Michael Richards
|
18th November 2011, 00:08 | #122 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
18th November 2011, 00:44 | #123 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
Remember, it wasn't racist. |
|
18th November 2011, 00:45 | #124 |
|
ok, enjoy your mediocre job/life!
|
18th November 2011, 00:48 | #125 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
Last edited by cyc : 18th November 2011 at 00:49. |
|
18th November 2011, 03:00 | #126 |
|
What's a Virginia Tech??
Also, again delusions of grandeur - thinking people are obsessed with you!!! |
18th November 2011, 03:06 | #127 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
BTW, thank you for yet another illustration of your obscene levels of stupidity and ignorance. The reference was in relation to the rather well-known Virgina Tech massacre -- you know, the worst campus shooting in US history. In view of how rabid and unbalanced you are, it'd be best if you go seek some psychiatric before reading up on this rather tragic event that's rather illustrative of what unbalanced, over-emo idiots can do when the wrong circumstances all come together. |
|
18th November 2011, 05:05 | #128 |
|
all perfectly valid points yet not addressing the major issue of concern: YOU ARE MEDIOCRE!!
|
18th November 2011, 07:51 | #129 |
|
Galbraiths. My vote is for cyc, I reckon he'd bust out some truly awesome Asian shit on fixed_truths honkey ass.
|
18th November 2011, 08:23 | #130 | |
Don't worry, be harpy
|
Quote:
Somehow I can't imagine that cyc is going to apologise for initially referring to you as a homosexual while insulting your political choices, but hey. |
|
18th November 2011, 08:29 | #131 | |
|
Quote:
But meh, I've said that I'll reflect on your guys perspective etc. But I still standby my claim that I wasn't insulting him based on his race and rather his (alleged) small penis being a reason for all his anger. Moving on etc.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
18th November 2011, 08:30 | #132 |
SLUTS!!!!!!!
|
back on topic:
from our local free community paper:
__________________
Slow internet is worse than no internet. It's like putting your penis in once and then being required to make out for 2 hours --Matt "The Oatmeal" Inman |
18th November 2011, 12:12 | #133 | ||||
Objection!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The more significant point is that I actually acted charitably and took fixed_faeces' point at its most favourable to him, namely that he was merely referring to Farrar as an ignorant hack that would mindlessly defend National at all costs. I then expressed my astonishment at the sheer hypocrisy of this guy making such an allegation given his own behaviour on here. Now, are you going to apologise for your selective reading and deliberate distortion of what went on? I doubt it. |
||||
18th November 2011, 12:28 | #134 |
|
^^ cyc proving he doesn't need to be a bigot to be a cunt.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
18th November 2011, 12:48 | #135 |
|
It's not libel if it's factual - so we're going to have to get a measurement here cyc.
As for fixed_truth, being gay isn't a negative thing so look at it this way, being a bumboy is something to celebrate! (this is a joke for those who lack that filter) |
18th November 2011, 13:40 | #136 |
Love, Actuary
|
I have heard of a case in the UK where a male customer reacted negatively to being called a wanker by a call centre employee. To cut to the end when his moment came in court he was unable to show that he wasn't.
|
18th November 2011, 14:28 | #137 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
18th November 2011, 15:03 | #139 |
Stunt Pants
|
Too many chinks, jews and faggots in this thread.
/I'm out
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
18th November 2011, 19:35 | #140 | |
|
Quote:
This is like a stone throwing contest taking place in a glass house considering all the transphobia/homophobia/sexism that goes unchecked on this forum. Anyway, TEA TAPES, REMEMBER THOSE? Obviously it was intentional. Key has handled this horribly. If the rumours about what's on them are true his response to this drama will probably impact his campaign more than their contents. Lesson for him: Say the same things in private that you say in public. His claim that going to the police is a principled stance is incredibly hypocritical considering the search and surveillance laws that his government has pushed. Apparently making secret recordings is OK if it'll lead to an arrest but it's not OK if it makes politics more transparent. The only reason to keep the contents of these recordings quiet is if they could negatively impact his campaign, making them of public interest, therefore they should be released. |
|
18th November 2011, 20:03 | #141 |
|
Oh, and comparing this to the Murdoch phone hacking scandal is one of the most idiotic things I've heard JK say.
|
18th November 2011, 20:25 | #142 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
Whether JK's stance in relation to this matter is wise (assuming it can somehow be objectively established one way or another, which I doubt) is a billion miles away from establishing that he's somehow a hypocrite for supporting the surveillance laws. |
|
18th November 2011, 20:35 | #143 | |
|
Quote:
For the record, neither really apply to me, but it wouldn't/shouldn't matter if it was the case. |
|
18th November 2011, 22:30 | #144 |
|
wait a minute..... is this thread not parody? has pottymouth cyc taken offence and been enabled in such(@nzg) for a possibly racial sleight?
you people are too stupid to even laugh at.
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way." |
18th November 2011, 22:41 | #145 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
|
|
18th November 2011, 22:48 | #146 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
|
|
19th November 2011, 00:54 | #147 |
|
haha. again with your 'stupidity' buzz.
it's like you think you are a zeus of intellect. I got news for you buddy, you're not! I shall call you mediocyc. |
19th November 2011, 01:07 | #148 |
|
That doesn't even parse well. Try again.
If you're going to mock someone, do a decent job of it. Not a mediocre one.
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية Last edited by crocos : 19th November 2011 at 01:08. |
19th November 2011, 01:11 | #149 |
Stunt Pants
|
Ah MrTTTT, only ever has one dis for each person, repeated over and over.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
19th November 2011, 06:15 | #150 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
19th November 2011, 11:03 | #151 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية |
|
19th November 2011, 11:41 | #152 |
Love, Actuary
|
This is a public forum and so it's not so surprising that people of all capabilities are represented here. What I find curious though is how it's always people diametrically opposite to cyc on the intelligence scale that engage in the types of conversation we've just witnessed. Where cyc is obviously smart and well educated these others are bottom feeders by those assessment criteria.
Thus, time and again, the interaction isn't really a fair fight. The challenger, being a person of sub-par intellect, always loses and ends up with another dunce stamp for their collection. |
19th November 2011, 11:51 | #153 |
|
I'm quite well educated I reckon. ^_^
|
19th November 2011, 12:01 | #154 |
Stunt Pants
|
And don't you show it.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
19th November 2011, 12:12 | #155 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
19th November 2011, 12:46 | #156 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
19th November 2011, 14:38 | #157 |
Love, Actuary
|
Perhaps I need to be clearer. I mean this form of educated: "characterized by or displaying qualities of culture and learning. "
|
19th November 2011, 14:52 | #158 |
|
It's still not clear to me. Can you illustrate with an example?
|
19th November 2011, 15:04 | #159 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
19th November 2011, 15:42 | #160 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Summary: Key's handled this brilliantly, using the public's mistrust of modern "journalism" to simultaneously keep Key in the media, get public sentiment on his side, and totally shut Phil Goff out. And he's played the media like the dumb bitches they are. |
|