|
12th October 2023, 12:42 | #321 |
|
What are the No voters talking points?
Obviously this has been put forward in collaboration with those that the initiative seeks to represent, and is in no way virtue signaling from a group of middle aged white folk?
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
12th October 2023, 17:48 | #322 |
|
Honestly the most prevalent No ads are being fronted by Warren Mundine, and Jacinta Price.
The main messaging is that creating a racial division in the constitution isn't the solution. Also quite cleverly getting aboriginal people saying that we are all Australians, dividing the country isn't what they want. I think on the Yes side there's a total lack of detail, and people just don't trust govt anymore. |
12th October 2023, 19:22 | #323 | ||
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
15th October 2023, 21:02 | #324 |
|
Resounding No vote, shows watercooler talk wasn't what people actually voted.
Thought Jacinda Price spoke well, basically telling the activist lefties that live in teal electorates to wake up. |
16th October 2023, 16:53 | #325 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
The activist lefties only listen to other activist lefties, hence why total failure in the referendum. They won't acknowledge that though.
|
13th March 2024, 11:25 | #326 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
|
13th March 2024, 13:24 | #327 |
|
How many are boomer aussies vs recent aussies with overseas money?
|
Yesterday, 13:54 | #328 | |
|
Australians are having fewer babies – experts say it could have more consequences than we realise
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
Yesterday, 15:24 | #329 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Thoughts:
I live in a comfortable middle-class bubble and I already bit the bullet and have already had kids, so wtf do I know. Also, yes. Also, who gives a fuck what international average baby numbers are? Western nations can't compare their own birthrates with places like Niger and Somalia. The question isn't how do we (AU or NZ) compare with somewhere else, the question is what birthrates do our economies require to maintain our standards of living?, or if a comparison is mandatory, how do the current birthrates compare with the birthrates when the laws and workplace practices that define our society were put in place? Also, last time I looked men don't have babies. So the problems become a lot more clear if you rephrase the statement as Australian women are likely to have an average of 1.6 babies over the next five years, below the international average of 2.3. What is it about Australian society in the year of our lord 2024 that is stopping women from having babies? See also: in Australia, women are the majority of university enrolments and graduations in almost every field of study except engineering and IT. |
Yesterday, 15:39 | #330 | |
|
Quote:
Lack of money due to the insane cost of living. Lack of time if one was to have a baby. As you'd have to go back to work and outsource the care of your child to a glorified cattery that is known as 'childcare' |
|
Yesterday, 18:13 | #331 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Insane cost of living means needing a good income.
Good income means getting a good job. Getting a good job means getting a degree. Getting a degree means putting babies on hold. Then you get the degree and get on the job ladder, and continuing on the ladder means not having babies. When you do achieve the comfort level required to have babies, you're now too old to have more than one or two. |