Random Thoughts II

[Pimp-X]

Originally Posted by doppelgänger of someone

No she doesn't.

Attempted motorboating is still on the cards.

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

where he directly attacks that user, using language that relates to homosexuality and genitalia.

Sounds like you only notice it because those things are so disturbing to you. Doughhead cockfag.


But again, you're overstating your case. You're not very good at this.

[Lightspeed]

In large doses they certainly are.

[MadMax]

Originally Posted by CCS

I deny that it's an obsessive need.

denial

[Pepsi]

Originally Posted by doppelgänger of someone

NZ Miss Universe rep:

Actually I'm surprised you're not that keen on her.. she has those Taylor Swift kind of eyes..

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

In large doses they certainly are.

Nah, you're just scared of homos and their dicks. Still, thanks for helping me justify my use of the words 'cock' and 'dick' and 'penis'.

[Lightspeed]

I'm not just anything.

[doppelgänger of someone]

Can Miss Universe NZ sing? No I don't think so. Wait, neither can Taylor Swift.

My obsession with her is waning, but then you have to drag her up again. Now I'm off to watch her music videos again...

Also Y, I found another one of your doppelgangers LITTERED across the internet:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/doppelganger

She is the editor of Merriam-Webster dictionary. Click on the video to the right to hear her (you?) speak.

[Pepsi]

Dude, she looks nothing like me. You must be losing your touch..

I like the last one you found thanks..

[doppelgänger of someone]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fV4TPLyQYE

Here is another one of her video, name is Kory Stamper.

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

I'm not just anything.

lol, yeah you are. Poor little victim. Go have a whine that people are 'ridiculing' you due to your retarded circular religious arguments. It's okay, go ahead. I'll have the wahmbulance on standby.

[CCS]

Originally Posted by doppelgänger of someone

Kory Stamper.

She's quite attractive for a nerd. Now I just need to see some pictures of her which show whether she has a fat ass or not.

[Pepsi]

Still looks nothing like me..come on man! I assume you're just picking her because she has kinda slanty eyes?

[CCS]

Supply me with a decent picture of yourself and I will decide whether you look like her or not.

[doppelgänger of someone]

Maybe we should ask Warrick to judge whether she looks like you or not. ^_^ She doesn't have dimples and her jaw is a bit squarer, but I can definitely see the resemblance.

[Pepsi]

Haha You have seen more photos of me than either of them, so you should know

[doppelgänger of someone]

Post it on your wall! Let the facebook mob judge! Better yet, ask your kids!

[Lightspeed]

Originally Posted by CCS

lol, yeah you are. Poor little victim. Go have a whine that people are 'ridiculing' you due to your retarded circular religious arguments. It's okay, go ahead. I'll have the wahmbulance on standby.

Oh. Oh dear. You've... you've really put me in my place, haven't you?

You're certainly the master of deflection, avoidance and denial, I'll give you that.

[CCS]

That's hilarious coming from the King of Obfuscation.

[Lightspeed]

I prefer the term "Lord of Obfuscation" or Loo for short.

[CCS]

It's funny how if I disagree with your crazy ideas then I'm deflecting, avoiding and denying. It's lame how you've come up with this theory that I'm obsessive about something and now you're looking for evidence to fit your theory. So far all you've come up with is some words to bandy about. Shame.

I'm beginning to think you're obsessed with me.

[Lightspeed]

I'm not obsessed with you. I just don't like how for the better part of a decade you have regularly and continue to regularly aggressively attack members of this forum, for no apparent reason other than that you're bored.

Does anyone dispute this?

[A Corpse]

Fucking hell do you wankstains need to gay up every thread? If this were a sitcom you'd be having angry sex by now.

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

I'm not obsessed with you. I just don't like how for the better part of a decade you have regularly and continue to regularly aggressively attack members of this forum, for no apparent reason other than that you're bored.

Sounds like obsession to me. And you've been feeling like this for the better part of the decade? You really need some help.

[[WanG] Wandarah]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

I'm not obsessed with you. I just don't like how for the better part of a decade you have regularly and continue to regularly aggressively attack members of this forum, for no apparent reason other than that you're bored.

Does anyone dispute this?

I dispute it! You two shall *not* be married under our laws!

[ePi]

Pepsi is hotter than Marié Digby.

[Lightspeed]

Originally Posted by CCS

Sounds like obsession to me. And you've been feeling like this for the better part of the decade? You really need some help.

People need help for having feelings? How do you come to that conclusion?

Originally Posted by [WanG] Wandarah

I dispute it! You two shall *not* be married under our laws!

Whose laws? Why not?

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

People need help for having feelings? How do you come to that conclusion?

I didn't come to that conclusion. Once again you've interpreted something incorrectly in order to suit your bias. All this crap you're spewing about me is a massive exaggeration. The fact that you cited an account the has been going for less than a year as a basis for something you claim to have been going on for the better part of a decade is just one example of how screwy your reasoning is. So here you are, concocting horseshit to back up your argument. You must feel pretty strongly about all of this. Maybe a little too strongly. Obsessive even. That's unhealthy.

So have you felt this way about me for the better part of a decade or did you just hit upon this in the last week?

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

Whose laws? Why not?

Surely you realise he's joking, right?

[crocos]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

Whose laws? Why not?

NZ's laws and because you'd need to get a Civil Union instead.

[Lightspeed]

Originally Posted by CCS

I didn't come to that conclusion.

Hold on, hold on. Back the truck up. You said "And you've been feeling like this for the better part of the decade? You really need some help."

If it's not the feelings you perceive I have that you're suggesting I need help with, what is it you're saying I need help for? Was "You really need some help" just a completely unrelated statement?

[Lightspeed]

Originally Posted by crocos

NZ's laws and because you'd need to get a Civil Union instead.

C'mon, I wasn't genuinely enquiring as to why CCS and I can't get married. Fuckin' hell.

[CCS]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

If it's not the feelings you perceive I have that you're suggesting I need help with, what is it you're saying I need help for? Was "You really need some help" just a completely unrelated statement?

Oh dude, you are so fucked in the head. You can't even comprehend basic English. Do you perhaps have a compulsive need to ignore the obvious meaning of a sentence and instead look for a more complex but unintended meaning?

[crocos]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

C'mon, I wasn't genuinely enquiring as to why CCS and I can't get married. Fuckin' hell.

I don't know man, given the history you two have, and your obsessive need to respond to his every thrust...

[Pimp-X]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

I'm not obsessed with you. I just don't like how for the better part of a decade you have regularly and continue to regularly aggressively attack members of this forum, for no apparent reason other than that you're bored.

Does anyone dispute this?

I'd dispute it. I don't think I've ever been attacked by CCS aggressively or regularly. Should I have been?

I think it's just you. For good reason, it seems.

[MadMax]

Originally Posted by A Corpse

Fucking hell do you wankstains need to gay up every thread? If this were a sitcom you'd be having angry sex by now.

[chiQ]

I'd dispute it to. CCS has had a lot of goes at me, Lightspeed, but only in response to my own outrageousness. He's like a litmus test for common sense. He's never caused any hurt though. There needs to be a higher, more personal care-factor for that to happen. Also, I like his humour, so I am definitely biased toward laughing off his jibes at me.

You are a seriously irritating person in a debate though, because you over-analyse and read into everything for meaning that simply isn't there. He responds to that, which makes you both all the more annoying.

I've many times wished you'd both put one another on ignore, but as you never do I occasionally put you both on ignore, so you don't clutter up the forum for me.

I don't know. If he has had an effect on your feelings for so long you maybe need to adjust the importance you place on what he posts. I don't think he can hurt anyone who keeps the activity on this forum in perspective.

[Pimp-X]

Trust you to be the voice of reason.

[Lightspeed]

Originally Posted by chiQ

I'd dispute it to. CCS has had a lot of goes at me, Lightspeed, but only in response to my own outrageousness. He's like a litmus test for common sense. He's never caused any hurt though. There needs to be a higher, more personal care-factor for that to happen. Also, I like his humour, so I am definitely biased toward laughing off his jibes at me.

You are a seriously irritating person in a debate though, because you over-analyse and read into everything for meaning that simply isn't there. He responds to that, which makes you both all the more annoying.

I've many times wished you'd both put one another on ignore, but as you never do I occasionally put you both on ignore, so you don't clutter up the forum for me.

I don't know. If he has had an effect on your feelings for so long you maybe need to adjust the importance you place on what he posts. I don't think he can hurt anyone who keeps the activity on this forum in perspective.

It's kind of weird, you're both agreeing with and disputing me at the same time. I certainly appreciate an additional, more reasoned perspective. I agree that CCS is often humorous, and I would actually appreciate what he brings, if he could stop. If his attacks weren't consistent and persistent.

I actually have had CCS on ignore for long chunks of time (as I have had several people.) And in that time CCS's behaviour didn't change, so this isn't about me and him. I mean, I'd laugh because even with Grease Monkey I could tell when CCS was posting by other people's reactions.

I'm not sure where all this talk about "feelings" is coming from (and then being completely denied when I challenge it.) I mean, we're not going to get into how chiQ finds my arguments seriously annoying and suggest she needs help, are we? And then go "Oh, no, I wasn't talking about her feelings and how she needs help, use common sense!"

My statement stands:
I don't like how for the better part of a decade CCS has regularly and continues to regularly aggressively attack members of this forum, for no apparent reason other than that he's bored.

I'm not saying that this is the only perspective, I'm not saying I'm myself absent of flaws, I'm not saying CCS should change. I'm just saying what it is and that I don't like it. I'm allowed my opinion and I'm allowed to share it, just like everyone else here.

Unless of course the powers that be decide that my 5 ppd are too much for this forum.

You might enjoy CCS's barrage of abuse chiQ, but I hope you can appreciate that not everyone does.

[Fx.]

Originally Posted by Lightspeed

My statement stands:
I don't like how for the better part of a decade CCS has regularly and continues to regularly aggressively attack members of this forum, for no apparent reason other than that he's bored.

its the internet !