|
28th April 2010, 18:06 | #81 |
|
She doesn't mind migrants. She just doesn't like the ones that aren't white.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
28th April 2010, 18:15 | #82 |
I have detailed files
|
Oh well, at least we can sleep at night safely knowing she is one of the soulless.
|
28th April 2010, 20:18 | #83 |
|
Not quite racist, but you wanna explain this one to us Ab?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/gay-do...-1225857841237
__________________
And if a double-decker lol, rofls into us, To lol by your side Is such a heavenly way to lol |
29th April 2010, 00:08 | #84 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
18th May 2010, 14:39 | #85 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
"Top blokes, totally out of character"
Summary: five totally not racist guys "repeatedly terrorised Aboriginal people for being Aboriginal, before getting a gun to terrorise them further, ending the night by beating a man to death, and then casually driving away without checking if their victim was okay". Judge tells the court what great guys the defendants are before deciding that the "crime is toward the lower end of the scale of seriousness for crimes of manslaughter". |
18th May 2010, 14:55 | #86 |
Don't worry, be harpy
|
|
18th May 2010, 15:10 | #87 |
|
Ahh yes, the lucky country.
|
18th May 2010, 16:41 | #88 |
|
See, this is why New Zealand > Australia. If this happened in New Zealand there would be a fucken shit storm.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
18th May 2010, 16:43 | #89 |
|
Like the 4year old kid beaten for wearing the wrong colours?
|
18th May 2010, 16:54 | #90 |
|
If the 4yr old had of been physically harmed then yeah, there would of been an even bigger public outcry.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
18th May 2010, 17:09 | #91 |
|
would HAVE, you fucken child rapist.
|
18th May 2010, 17:23 | #92 | |
I have detailed files
|
Quote:
|
|
18th May 2010, 17:24 | #93 |
|
@TM just up there... u mad?
|
18th May 2010, 17:49 | #94 | |
|
Quote:
Damn Labou..oh wait.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
|
18th May 2010, 17:53 | #95 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
18th May 2010, 20:52 | #97 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
18th May 2010, 22:16 | #98 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
13th June 2010, 14:52 | #99 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Look, Andrew Johns isn't a racist, he just thinks Greg Inglis is a black cunt.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/s...0612-y4xj.html |
13th June 2010, 15:05 | #100 |
|
To Johns & the NRl's credit they do seem to be taking it very seriously. Hopefully it can make some headway against this type of language as being part of the everyday Aussie vernacular.
Meanwhile back in multi-cultural paradise NZ - Andy Hayden is still a Rugby World Cup Ambassador.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
13th June 2010, 15:16 | #101 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
13th June 2010, 15:28 | #102 |
|
I've taken to using the "I'm not a racist, but" phrase much more liberally in any context.
It really livens up the place. "I'm not a racist, but I'm just going down the shops for some chips. Want anything?" "I'm not a racist, but can you please pass the tomato sauce?" "I'm not a racist, but I much prefer livejournal over facebook." |
13th June 2010, 15:58 | #103 |
|
Got a mild giggle out of me... think I might throw it around a bit more myself.
'I'm not a racist but, have you clicked on the start button and then selected control panel?' |
13th June 2010, 17:55 | #104 | |
|
Quote:
duh.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
13th June 2010, 18:01 | #105 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
IIRC correctly, Haden claimed that the Crusaders had a "no more than 3 darkies" team policy. What's racist about that?
|
13th June 2010, 18:15 | #106 | |
|
Quote:
2. 'Darkies' lumps all people of 'dark' skin into one group. Polynesian people are not a distinct group & also many people of Polynesian decent aren't 'dark'. 3. 'Three darkies, no more' makes the the false assumption that when it comes to successful rugby there is an inherent superiority in non Polynesian players.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
13th June 2010, 18:23 | #107 |
|
Okay, so did Andy Haden simply quote the stated policy of the Crusaders team as he had been told it, or was it his personal choice to use the word "darkies" in the statement? If he was just quoting someone else verbatim to make some kind of point, then you can hardly accuse him of being racist for his usage of the word.
|
13th June 2010, 18:48 | #108 | |
|
Quote:
Oooooh, I see. Now that you've explained the inherent racism in what I previously thought was an entirely harmless statement, do you think you could explain the sarcasm in Abs post? Because I think that most people will have missed it if you don't.
__________________
Beware of the leopard |
|
13th June 2010, 18:52 | #109 |
|
There wasn't any sarcasm in Ab's post - iirc he's a minority so has first dibs on what's racist or not.
|
13th June 2010, 19:11 | #110 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
||
13th June 2010, 19:13 | #111 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
13th June 2010, 19:46 | #112 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
NZ's reaction: PUBLIC 1: OMG that's terrible! Hold on, let's not fly off the handle, we need to be sure of that facts. Has there been any confirmation of this? PUBLIC 2: Yes, it's confirmed. He really did say "darkies". PUBLIC 1: BURN HIM!!! |
|
13th June 2010, 19:55 | #113 |
|
^Actual LOL.
|
13th June 2010, 19:58 | #114 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Beware of the leopard |
|
14th June 2010, 03:42 | #115 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
14th June 2010, 11:04 | #116 | ||
|
Quote:
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
||
14th June 2010, 11:10 | #117 |
|
This just in:
Classic Australian group sings extremely racist ditty! |
14th June 2010, 11:14 | #118 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
14th June 2010, 11:26 | #119 | |
|
Quote:
I am aware of who the target audience for The Wiggles is, but nothing about that song makes sense to me at all. |
|
14th June 2010, 11:49 | #120 | |
|
Quote:
But I've gotta say the way Tahu went about it was utterly woeful. Couldn't he have just pulled Johns aside instead of going to the media? Tahu is a complete dick (he is - judging by the bullshit he spun about league when he defected to union), but I wonder if there wasn't something else going on for him to go to the media... I wonder if it was a grudge against Johns, or if he had already complained to staff and nothing was done about it, or... Who knows. But it seems weird. |
|