|
10th November 2008, 09:57 | #41 |
Stunt Pants
|
I think the whole EFA thing was just a knee-jerk reaction to fear of the Exclusive Brethren colluding to install a government of their choice. Which is just an absurd idea.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
10th November 2008, 10:08 | #42 |
simulationszeitalter
|
Helen rocked it. Apart from the last stretch. This election campaign was terrible and she could have gone out on a sweeter note if it hadn't been so snarky.
Interesting that many countries are voting left (e.g. the US), and NZ is now completely out of step. |
10th November 2008, 10:24 | #43 | |
|
Quote:
blogs, TV, radio, the newspapers... they were all full of individual's political opinions. the reaction to the EFA is similar to the reaction to the anti-smacking bill but it seems like right-wing over-reaction to me
__________________
'[]' []-[] [] []\[] []< |
|
10th November 2008, 10:34 | #44 |
|
i wish people would stop using right-wing left-wing definitions as they don't even apply in NZ. eg. ACT is considered the most right wing, but they are also a liberal party. Whereas in the US democrats are a liberal party, and republicans are conservative. the right-wing bashing just doesn't make sense in our country, where two major parties are so centrist they could have a coalition of their own.
|
10th November 2008, 10:35 | #45 |
|
I'm inclined to think that Aunty Helen touched Golden Teapot in the no-no place when he was a child?
|
10th November 2008, 10:38 | #46 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
10th November 2008, 11:17 | #47 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is everyone so unhappy these days? |
|
10th November 2008, 12:11 | #48 |
|
As much as I think Helen did a good job but fucked things up in the last couple of years, I really really didn't want to see National or Keys come into power.
Sure you shouldn't judge on past mistakes and it's really too early to tell - but looking at Nationals track record, all I can see is our future getting sold off to private enterprise and a leader who changes his word depending on the mood. I only hope I get proved wrong - I really do. |
10th November 2008, 12:14 | #49 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
10th November 2008, 12:17 | #50 | |
|
Quote:
you could try and be perceptive and state that we are "first" in a new trend We kiwis love being first. |
|
10th November 2008, 12:19 | #51 |
Nothing to See Here!
|
I think the Onion describes the US 2-party system pretty well
http://www.theonion.com/content/news...ng_lower_class |
10th November 2008, 12:32 | #52 |
|
So glad we no longer have to listen to that smarmy cunt Michael Cullen.
|
10th November 2008, 12:38 | #53 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is everyone so unhappy these days? |
|
10th November 2008, 12:40 | #54 |
Nothing to See Here!
|
I was a fan of Cullen as finance minister right up until this year when he went back on pretty much everything he said about fiscal prudence over the years to deliver election year bribes in the form of tax cuts.
|
10th November 2008, 13:12 | #55 | |
SLUTS!!!!!!!
|
Quote:
geez, Sir Rog, tell us what you really think!
__________________
Slow internet is worse than no internet. It's like putting your penis in once and then being required to make out for 2 hours --Matt "The Oatmeal" Inman |
|
10th November 2008, 15:23 | #57 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
10th November 2008, 15:42 | #58 |
Stunt Pants
|
Will you be super pissed off if I nark on you?
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
10th November 2008, 15:43 | #59 |
|
is there a reward for narking?
|
10th November 2008, 16:46 | #60 |
|
I think Helen was an awesome PM. She got rid of the interest on student loans that the National government introduced.
She also got rid of the horrendous fee's the patients had to pay at hospitals which the National government also introduced. She's done a lot for the working people of this country which has helped many including myself Thanks Aunty |
10th November 2008, 19:16 | #61 |
|
Two days after losing the election outgoing Prime Minister Helen Clark is being sued for defamation over comments she made on the Auckland District Health Board laboratories row
hah http://www.stuff.co.nz/vote08/4756353a28435.html
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
10th November 2008, 19:31 | #62 |
|
Honestly most of the people here weren't doing any worthwhile campaigning for anyone. I don't think my opinion of anyone, or any party improved based on nzg discussion. It was all essentially "lol ur a fucktard if u dont think like me, i cant even comprehend why you'd vote that way lolol" from both sides.
__________________
Weak hearts I rip. |
10th November 2008, 20:06 | #63 | |
|
Quote:
Phil Goff (LABOUR) was Minister of Education when student fees went from $200 to $2500. This was also when the student loans were introduced not under National
__________________
Don't mind me, I'm sleep deprived |
|
10th November 2008, 21:08 | #64 |
|
Student loans were actually introduced by National in 1992.
|
10th November 2008, 23:04 | #65 | |
Love, Actuary
|
Quote:
|
|
10th November 2008, 23:10 | #66 |
|
Wikipedia: Student Loans in NZ
Yup, '92, National. Got one myself. National policy [see here] say that they'll add 10% repayment bonus on their loans. Lets see if they deliver. |
10th November 2008, 23:32 | #67 |
|
I stand corrected (After all Wiki MUSt be right )
Helen said she is going to work for her electorate: Translation: she is going to work the speaking circuit and work to get herself a plumb job at the UN
__________________
Don't mind me, I'm sleep deprived |
11th November 2008, 17:32 | #68 |
|
Phil Goff eh.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
11th November 2008, 18:42 | #69 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Great, another Muldoon-era MP who's been in Parliament for thirty years. For bonus lols he was also one of Roger Douglas's right-hand men.
THAT'S NOT CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN |
11th November 2008, 18:58 | #70 |
Mate, feed, kill, repeat
|
Whatever you think of Labour's policies, Aunty Helen was a strong leader and an excellent speaker. FWIW I too thought Labour needed to go, but you can't really say the same things about John Key! He looks lame, sounds lame and does lame shit for the media (a maori kid and a kitten.. hmm).
|
11th November 2008, 19:10 | #71 | |
|
Quote:
he's got a new carrot in his walk too |
|
11th November 2008, 20:14 | #72 | |
|
Quote:
for the record.... muldoon era politicians are a waste of space?
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way." |
|
11th November 2008, 20:29 | #73 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Not at all, I just think it's going to be hard for Labour to "rebrand" itself as being youthful with fresh ideas if its leader has been part of Parliamentary politics for thirty years.
As far as "ideas" goes, well, Annette King. Say no more. |
11th November 2008, 21:17 | #74 | |
|
Quote:
fair call, but shane jones would be open to mucho derision if called up this soon. im looking forward to the next 3 years in NZ politics.
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way." |
|
12th November 2008, 12:35 | #76 |
|
It will probably only be a 1 term Nat government. national has inherited a magnificent hospital pass: Unemployment is being tipped to hit 6% and the deficit is already flagged as a billion or so more. It will take more than one term to fix it without the impact of the overseas meltdown.
__________________
Don't mind me, I'm sleep deprived |
12th November 2008, 12:37 | #77 |
|
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
12th November 2008, 12:41 | #78 |
Stunt Pants
|
Shame Labour
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
12th November 2008, 12:43 | #79 |
|
Now they're in opposition they want to roll it back, shocker
|
12th November 2008, 12:47 | #80 | |
|
Ummm no...
All that article says is that they are interested in being involved in the rewriting of the act and that Goff felt it was unwise for it to be passed under urgency (i.e. rammed through). In fact no where in that article does it say that they want to get rid of it, or as say, "maybe the EFA wasn't such a good idea." Quote:
__________________
Civilised is as civilised does and civilised people walk among us. Last edited by [Malks] Pixie : 12th November 2008 at 12:48. |
|