National Thus Far - Page 5

[WanG] Wandarah · 24th March 2009, 22:57

well, thank you for clearing that up. much obliged.

Helious · 24th March 2009, 23:00

Haydos was/is very VERY VERY pro National.

this crazy fat cunt is pro Labour.

chubby · 24th March 2009, 23:05

is it the pic that excites the vitriol?

Torka · 24th March 2009, 23:06

What? He's not remotely similar to Haydos.

Helious · 24th March 2009, 23:06

Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way.

chubby · 24th March 2009, 23:12

http://www.kiwipolitico.com/2009/03/...al-will-erode/

tie a knot brothers.

chubby · 24th March 2009, 23:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torka

What? He's not remotely similar to Haydos.

i do get a bit angry and call people names.
but this is the internet.
and they deserve it.

Helious · 24th March 2009, 23:33

you're nothing like Haydos. He would battle anyone and everyone until they had nothing left.

He's MENSA.

You're Fat.

chubby · 24th March 2009, 23:37

SWALK.

goodnight.

Reformed_Quint · 24th March 2009, 23:53

Chubby hates me.

But i can't understand what hes saying half the time. It makes things difficult.

And that link, What the fuck?

CCS · 25th March 2009, 00:55

Hmmm... frogblog... I thought I smelled something decidedly dodgy the moment I clapped eyes on this:

Quote:

What I found was probably the National Party’s most coherent and well articulated policy:

I think a blank white page with a picture of a bloke says all that needs to be said!

I had a look at the National website, went to the Women's Affairs page and saw this:

Buhh? That doesn't look like the picture on the Greens' blog! So I clicked on the little bit that said 'More...'

Guhh?! Still doesn't look like the picture supplied by the Greens! Although, to be fair, the url in their screenshot is a wee bit different. So I checked that.

It's almost like each time I check the women's affairs section, there's more there! I still don't know how to get it to look like the screen shot the Greens have

chubby · 25th March 2009, 07:10

it's a joke screenshot, which he clearly articulates-
sarcastic conspiracy guy.

chubby · 25th March 2009, 07:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reformed_Quint

Chubby hates me.

But i can't understand what hes saying half the time. It makes things difficult.

And that link, What the fuck?

i dont hate you.
but i do hate your ignorance.
like the average contrarian you place a lot of weight on the appearence of 'balance' and an 'un-biased' opinion, but every opinion you express is primarily a denial of anything which dosent fit with stuff you already believe.

it's similar (on a interpersonal scale) to the equal space and gravity given by an organ like the herald to a small political lobbying firms press releases, and a report, signed by most of the worlds reputable climatologists, peer reviewed, and well intentioned.

theres too much of it, and its not making the world a better place.

Golden Teapot · 25th March 2009, 07:36

A joke? No, it's a bare-faced lie.

I'd not realised that Chubby had so much stand-up comedian in him. The quality here is not too bad, and certainly I can't complain given he is performing for all of us for free.

Of course, it could be that he's simply snapped. He was cleary on the edge in the past, and things haven't been going too well for his sort of late. I'm not sure that there is a world left for the ultra-left, save under MMP where a meaingless vote can be cast in that direction.

Points out of ten for this week? Lets see... I think 5.5 is fair?

chubby · 25th March 2009, 07:55

the little, black, bug-like things on the page-letters.
they make words.

and me and mine chuckle about you too, fella.

caffiend · 25th March 2009, 10:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golden Teapot

A joke? No, it's a bare-faced lie.

When people say "Knock knock" and then you ask "Who's there?" and then they say "Batman"... do you tell them that it's not possible they are Batman, since Batman is a fictional comic book character, and in any case, where's their cape and mask?

CCS · 25th March 2009, 12:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by chubby

it's a joke screenshot

Pfft, no it's not. They're trying to pass it off as truth so that they can say "Look, National has no Women's Affair policies lololol!!!" Yeah. Great. Nice try, Greens, but you got caught.

Hory · 25th March 2009, 12:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCS

Hmmm... frogblog... I thought I smelled something decidedly dodgy the moment I clapped eyes on this:

I had a look at the National website, went to the Women's Affairs page and saw this:

Buhh? That doesn't look like the picture on the Greens' blog! So I clicked on the little bit that said 'More...'

Guhh?! Still doesn't look like the picture supplied by the Greens! Although, to be fair, the url in their screenshot is a wee bit different. So I checked that.

It's almost like each time I check the women's affairs section, there's more there! I still don't know how to get it to look like the screen shot the Greens have

The blog post is dated February 21.
It's now March 25, I would assume whomever is in charge of National's website has fixed the problem by now.
It was actually blank when the post was published.

Ab · 25th March 2009, 12:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hory

The blog post is dated February 21.
It's now March 25, I would assume whomever is in charge of National's website has fixed the problem by now.

Bullshit. In the run-up to the December election I had the policy sections of all the main parties' websites open constantly to do issue comparisons, and that page wasn't blank then. In fact the only political website that had no useful info was the Labour site, as none of its policies had been updated since 2005.

CCS · 25th March 2009, 13:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hory

The blog post is dated February 21.
It's now March 25, I would assume whomever is in charge of National's website has fixed the problem by now.
It was actually blank when the post was published.

*shrug* I don't need to apologise for how National maintains their website. If the page was broken then it's not the same as not having a policy.

Hory · 25th March 2009, 13:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ab

Bullshit. In the run-up to the December election I had the policy sections of all the main parties' websites open constantly to do issue comparisons, and that page wasn't blank then. In fact the only political website that had no useful info was the Labour site, as none of its policies had been updated since 2005.

The election was in November, but in February '09 the page was blank, this was commented on at The Standard as well.
If the page wasn't blank when the post was published in February don't you think that would have been mentioned in the comments section of the blog?

chubby · 25th March 2009, 17:46

got indignant?

CCS · 25th March 2009, 18:25

You won't believe what the greens have done this time.

Maybe someone haxed their site.

chubby · 25th March 2009, 18:48

^^ wow.
i know you is good at that stuff.... but im flattered you spent the time.

by the way- you guys were a riot on the OHP at work today

plaz0r · 25th March 2009, 18:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCS

Maybe someone haxed their site.

No, that's clearly their child welfare policy.

Ab · 25th March 2009, 19:00

Come on, it's obvious that it's not really a screenshot of the Greens site. It's not calling for something to be banned.

ZoSo · 25th March 2009, 19:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by chubby

by the way- you guys were a riot on the OHP at work today

I'm trying to envisage this scenario, based on the subject.. and yeah..
Your conversations at work must be a riot.
"HAY GUYS LOOK AT THIS"

JP · 25th March 2009, 19:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ab

Come on, it's obvious that it's not really a screenshot of the Greens site. It's not calling for something to be banned.

DDDDDD DOUBLE POST

JP · 25th March 2009, 19:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ab

Come on, it's obvious that it's not really a screenshot of the Greens site. It's not calling for something to be banned.

Not that I agree with all of the greens proposed regulations, but I find it hard to believe people get so pissy over it. Most i've seen are generally for the greater good, but will cause people to suffer a slight discomfort (or none at all). It's not [i]that[i] bad in politics really.

chubby · 26th March 2009, 01:09

http://blog.greens.org.nz/2009/03/25...e-not-cheaper/

Reformed_Quint · 26th March 2009, 10:45

Dear lordy, I hope i'm not in NZ when the greens get in.

Luse · 26th March 2009, 15:09

Was watching this last night and thought they looked similar.

ZoSo · 26th March 2009, 15:14

SO going on the OHP.

CCS · 26th March 2009, 15:16

NO, NOT THE OHP!

Luse · 26th March 2009, 15:20

Overhead Projector?

ZoSo · 26th March 2009, 15:22

Yeah man. It's riotous.

Whiplash · 26th March 2009, 15:23

lol @ the greens

Reformed_Quint · 26th March 2009, 16:35

Good call luse

chubby · 26th March 2009, 19:18

echo.....echo.......echo........

farns · 26th March 2009, 19:26

They are doing pretty well but this giant fucking cycle path is a complete waste of time and resources when there are far greater priorities.
I guess someone threw it up as a easy vote catcher, so many people here that like to ride on their bicycles, and a uniting the country deal from north to south, but its completely fatous and unnecessary IMO.
This country has plenty of picturesque and scarcely used farm roads if SH1 isnt good enough already.
A paved or semi paved track across farmland or national park is an eyesore in any case.

25th March 2009, 18:25	#183
CCS Stunt Pants	You won't believe what the greens have done this time. Maybe someone haxed their site. __________________ I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner?

26th March 2009, 15:16	#194
CCS Stunt Pants	NO, NOT THE OHP! __________________ I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner?

24th March 2009, 22:57	#161
[WanG] Wandarah	well, thank you for clearing that up. much obliged.

24th March 2009, 23:00	#162
Helious	Haydos was/is very VERY VERY pro National. this crazy fat cunt is pro Labour.

24th March 2009, 23:05	#163
chubby	is it the pic that excites the vitriol? __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

24th March 2009, 23:06	#164
Torka	What? He's not remotely similar to Haydos.

24th March 2009, 23:06	#165
Helious	Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way.

24th March 2009, 23:12	#166
chubby	http://www.kiwipolitico.com/2009/03/...al-will-erode/ tie a knot brothers. __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

24th March 2009, 23:33	#168
Helious	you're nothing like Haydos. He would battle anyone and everyone until they had nothing left. He's MENSA. You're Fat.

24th March 2009, 23:37	#169
chubby	SWALK. goodnight. __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

24th March 2009, 23:53	#170
Reformed_Quint	Chubby hates me. But i can't understand what hes saying half the time. It makes things difficult. And that link, What the fuck? Last edited by Reformed_Quint : 24th March 2009 at 23:56.

25th March 2009, 07:10	#172
chubby	it's a joke screenshot, which he clearly articulates- sarcastic conspiracy guy. __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

25th March 2009, 07:36	#174
Golden Teapot Love, Actuary	A joke? No, it's a bare-faced lie. I'd not realised that Chubby had so much stand-up comedian in him. The quality here is not too bad, and certainly I can't complain given he is performing for all of us for free. Of course, it could be that he's simply snapped. He was cleary on the edge in the past, and things haven't been going too well for his sort of late. I'm not sure that there is a world left for the ultra-left, save under MMP where a meaingless vote can be cast in that direction. Points out of ten for this week? Lets see... I think 5.5 is fair?

25th March 2009, 07:55	#175
chubby	the little, black, bug-like things on the page-letters. they make words. and me and mine chuckle about you too, fella. __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

25th March 2009, 17:46	#182
chubby	got indignant? __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

25th March 2009, 18:48	#184
chubby	^^ wow. i know you is good at that stuff.... but im flattered you spent the time. by the way- you guys were a riot on the OHP at work today __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

25th March 2009, 19:00	#186
Ab A mariachi ogre snorkel	Come on, it's obvious that it's not really a screenshot of the Greens site. It's not calling for something to be banned.

26th March 2009, 01:09	#190
chubby	http://blog.greens.org.nz/2009/03/25...e-not-cheaper/ __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

26th March 2009, 10:45	#191
Reformed_Quint	Dear lordy, I hope i'm not in NZ when the greens get in.

26th March 2009, 15:09	#192
Luse	Was watching this last night and thought they looked similar.

26th March 2009, 15:23	#197
Whiplash Bobo Fettish	lol @ the greens

26th March 2009, 19:18	#199
chubby	echo.....echo.......echo........ __________________ "Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."

26th March 2009, 19:26	#200
farns	They are doing pretty well but this giant fucking cycle path is a complete waste of time and resources when there are far greater priorities. I guess someone threw it up as a easy vote catcher, so many people here that like to ride on their bicycles, and a uniting the country deal from north to south, but its completely fatous and unnecessary IMO. This country has plenty of picturesque and scarcely used farm roads if SH1 isnt good enough already. A paved or semi paved track across farmland or national park is an eyesore in any case.