|
29th February 2016, 15:59 | #121 |
|
Sounds about right. The transitivity assumption doesn't hold here though, bob.
|
29th February 2016, 16:31 | #122 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
29th February 2016, 17:43 | #123 |
|
So how is Trump going to beat Hillary?
|
29th February 2016, 17:46 | #124 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
29th February 2016, 18:02 | #125 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Trump vs Rubio? I reckon Rubio would take that. Trump vs Cruz? Cruz could possibly take that. Trump vs Rubio vs Cruz vs Carson vs Kasich? Trump wins that EASY. |
|
29th February 2016, 18:31 | #126 |
|
The one constant I always hear/read about Hillary is about her lying...
13 Minutes of Clinton lying She must be getting tips from Donkey |
29th February 2016, 20:31 | #127 |
|
Like Jeb!, the "rest" of the Republicans are entirely dependent on funding, which will dry up if their polling drops causing them to drop out. Trump isn't dependent on that, so even if he wasn't the front runner, he could last the distance by being self-funded.
Hillary and Sanders are also dependent on funding, but while Hillary's obviously hugely backed by the DNC itself, and funded by special interests, Sanders is an out-lyer like Trump, only he's using crowd funded Populares tactics to avoid being dependent on special interests.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
29th February 2016, 20:55 | #128 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ Last edited by Cyberbob : 29th February 2016 at 20:56. |
|
29th February 2016, 21:40 | #129 |
|
There are also those who will vote for Sanders, or won't vote.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
29th February 2016, 21:49 | #130 | |
|
Quote:
Also thanks for the new word. "Populares" wasn't one I'd encountered before
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية |
|
1st March 2016, 03:10 | #131 |
|
John Oliver Destroys Donald Trump
20 minutes long. Remember to regularly pause it, so that you will be able to stop laughing and breathe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGc2nN9OguQ |
1st March 2016, 11:47 | #132 | |
Mmm... Sacrilicious
|
Quote:
LOL. |
|
1st March 2016, 13:12 | #133 |
Architeuthis
|
A Trump presidency is pretty much a doomsday scenario.
|
1st March 2016, 13:30 | #134 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
If the world were not so interconnected and if the USA were not in possession of the world's largest nuclear arsenal, I would be laughing and shouting "THE CHICKENS IS COMING HOME TO ROOST Y'ALL".
|
1st March 2016, 14:05 | #135 |
Robosexual
|
|
1st March 2016, 15:49 | #136 |
|
I wonder if this will influence anyone tomorrow.
Clinton Foundation discloses $40M in Wall St donations
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
1st March 2016, 18:07 | #137 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
Say what you want about Hilary, at least she has foreign affairs experience.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
1st March 2016, 19:49 | #138 |
|
Chris Christie proves how much of a wuss he really is...
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...19986?lo=ap_e3 This comment cracked me up: Miles Pieri · Daleknetics Auditor at Church of Skarotology So, what has Trump offered Christie? VP? Secretary of State? A bacon double cheeseburger? |
1st March 2016, 21:42 | #139 |
|
Oh wow. I hadn't even begun thinking who Trump might have in his administration beyond Palin. Can you imagine? Seriously, does anyone have any tragicomic ideas?
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
1st March 2016, 22:25 | #140 |
|
The two of them are as bad as each other. I really hope tomorrow he loses a few in Super Tuesday.
|
2nd March 2016, 03:24 | #141 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
|
2nd March 2016, 07:08 | #142 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd March 2016, 08:23 | #143 |
|
Are they doing live tallies today?
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
2nd March 2016, 14:09 | #144 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
If he goes up against Hillary, he'll win.
|
2nd March 2016, 14:21 | #145 |
|
"Uhh, Bill? You're not allowed there."
Hillary Clinton’s campaign has been “reminded” not to solicit votes near polling sites after President Bill Clinton ventured into a polling location in Boston edit: With a megaphone?
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
2nd March 2016, 14:48 | #146 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
2nd March 2016, 14:50 | #147 |
|
I love the news coverage of this. I noticed it in one of the earlier states.
"Clinton Wins" - 4% of votes tallied. They must be very confident with their exit polls. |
2nd March 2016, 17:04 | #148 |
|
There's still some question of whether or not Hillary will be indicted over the email business she's involved in.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
2nd March 2016, 17:38 | #149 |
|
I see how Trump can win the Republican nomination but (& I might be in denial) surely there's enough voters overall that can see he would be a disaster as President?
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
2nd March 2016, 19:19 | #150 | ||
Mmm... Sacrilicious
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2nd March 2016, 19:23 | #151 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
3rd March 2016, 12:06 | #152 |
|
Read an article saying that trumps power surge is because authoritarian people support him, which is bi-partisan. Also states that most people are latent-authoritarian, and only become active when there is a trigger event, like economic downturn, influx of foreigners or moral panic.
So I fully expect Trump to be president if Sanders doesn't oppose him. |
3rd March 2016, 13:31 | #153 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Oh please, Sanders doesn't stand a chance. I like a fairytale as much as the next guy but anyone who thinks he can beat Clinton is DREAMING.
And Trump will beat Clinton. I can't believe this is where we are. |
3rd March 2016, 13:36 | #154 |
|
I admire Sanders's conviction to stick around until all 50 states have voted, and sure, he'll win more north states than he did in the south, but it's incredibly one sided against him at the moment unfortunately, even with all the hugely negative Clinton news at the moment.
The big issue comes in November, when Clinton can't count on Sanders votes
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ Last edited by Cyberbob : 3rd March 2016 at 13:37. |
3rd March 2016, 13:39 | #155 | |
|
Quote:
Its also possible that the GOP don't pick Trump as their candidate, very unlikely, but possible |
|
3rd March 2016, 13:48 | #156 | ||
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
3rd March 2016, 13:59 | #157 | |
|
Quote:
This is why I prefer our sort of system. We pick the party, the party picks the leader. The skills needed to run for office in the US are so different to the skills needed to effectively govern, it's no surprise the US is in the state it is now. Have one of each. Germany's got it right.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ Last edited by Cyberbob : 3rd March 2016 at 14:01. |
|
3rd March 2016, 13:59 | #158 |
|
edit: i have no idea how a doublepost was even possible.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ |
3rd March 2016, 14:43 | #159 | |||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Q. Can the superdelegates change their vote? Not that they would want to. Quote:
Clinton would definitely win. It wouldn't take many votes for the GOP candidate rather than trump to drop him out. Especially if there is really only a few % between Trump & Clinton. |
|||
3rd March 2016, 14:58 | #160 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|