|
2nd September 2010, 00:28 | #41 |
|
fucken farmers. they moan all the time. shit give me a piece of land 1/10th the size of yours and i'll be happy.
|
2nd September 2010, 00:50 | #42 |
Stunt Pants
|
Jail that Hubbard cunt and his wife, tbh.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
2nd September 2010, 02:20 | #43 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Newsflash farmers, your 10 million dollar farm ain't worth 10 million dollars.
|
2nd September 2010, 07:42 | #44 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
So we can afford to let these people realise a nearly 50% yeild in a matter of weeks, yet we can't give teachers flu shots? |
||
2nd September 2010, 10:53 | #45 |
|
Yeah, wtf? Labour better fucking use this bullshit come election year.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
2nd September 2010, 11:08 | #46 |
get to da choppa
|
The government should get a decent chunk of this money back once it sells the assets? yes/no?
|
2nd September 2010, 11:51 | #47 |
|
Or even offer them a cost of living increase.
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
2nd September 2010, 11:52 | #48 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
2nd September 2010, 12:14 | #49 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd September 2010, 12:17 | #50 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
|
2nd September 2010, 12:20 | #51 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd September 2010, 12:30 | #52 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
2nd September 2010, 12:36 | #53 |
Nothing to See Here!
|
Labour is just as tainted by this.
Basically it boils down to a choice between Kang and Kodos. |
2nd September 2010, 12:47 | #54 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
|
2nd September 2010, 12:51 | #55 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd September 2010, 12:56 | #56 |
|
But it's such a valuable service to PIs and Westies! They need to be able to borrow that money to support the custom mags and marijuanna industries!
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
2nd September 2010, 13:13 | #57 |
get to da choppa
|
I'm not so up to the game with financial regulation, but is National doing any better this term in implementing some sort of regulation regime or roadmap?
|
2nd September 2010, 13:15 | #58 | ||
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2nd September 2010, 13:16 | #59 |
|
Is it a fair assessment to say neither party is in a position to make much progress on this?
My reasoning is National is in the pockets of the people who make money of these schemes and Labour is under the thumb of those who use/are exploited by these schemes.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
2nd September 2010, 13:18 | #60 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd September 2010, 13:21 | #61 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
As Golden Teapot once put it,
Quote:
|
|
2nd September 2010, 13:29 | #62 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
|
2nd September 2010, 13:49 | #63 |
Mrs Colin Farrell
|
Hold on, where does it mention that investors will be getting paid the interest as well as their initial deposit? If that's true then that's fucking nuts. I was just happy to receive my deposit back. And my interest rate was at 10.25%. Noice.
|
2nd September 2010, 14:17 | #64 | |||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|||
2nd September 2010, 15:51 | #65 | |||
|
^ Got to agree there, Labour definitely played their part in establishing the fund, but it appears that National specifically extended the fund on fears about SCF and ignored anything that would prevent them going through with it.
Cactus Kate as Ab said does a good job of explaining it: Quote:
nzherald Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
2nd September 2010, 15:59 | #66 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd September 2010, 16:20 | #67 |
Mrs Colin Farrell
|
Deadmeat - thanks, I did look through a bunch of articles but didn't see the interest bit mentioned. That's insane if you ask me, and that's coming from somebody with bonds in SCF. I only hoped that I'd get the principal back. National huh *snort*
|
2nd September 2010, 17:28 | #68 |
|
I'm really hoping this $1.6 billion doesn't end up in residential property. I can nearly afford a house.
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
2nd September 2010, 19:28 | #69 |
Objection!
|
It was absolutely stupid to establish a fucking deposit guarantee that also guaranteed people's fucking interest returns. Investments are meant to have SOME risks. Completely risk free "investments" effectively include a free money element. GG, Labour and National.
|
2nd September 2010, 20:40 | #70 |
|
wow, ironclad 10%pa return? Why did I bother with the stock market?
|
2nd September 2010, 23:31 | #71 |
Objection!
|
The LOLs continue
IT'S THE RICH PRICKS' FAULT!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/pers...-for-SCFs-fall Stupidly extended and poorly drafted deposit guarantees causing market distortions? Oh who would have thought.... |
3rd September 2010, 10:17 | #72 | |
|
HEY MR KEY, TELL ME WHY I HAVE TO PAY
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
3rd September 2010, 11:03 | #73 |
|
Good news everyone! Apparently only 500 million of that investor money is from Canterbury. The rest is youse North Islanders.
__________________
So the perkbuster Hide abusing perks, crimbuster Garrett actually a crim - what's next? Roger Douglas is secretly poor? --Saladin |
3rd September 2010, 14:52 | #74 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
|
3rd September 2010, 15:05 | #75 |
|
Naah, doesn't have the mean goatee, enough hair, big enough snoz, or the hardcore horn-rimmed glasses.
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية |
4th September 2010, 00:13 | #76 | |
Mmm... Sacrilicious
|
Quote:
|
|
5th September 2010, 23:45 | #77 |
Objection!
|
The stupidity of the Hubbard and SCF defenders never ceases to amaze:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=10670781 The comment of one brainless fuckwit sums it up: maybe [Hubbard] lent money to farmers without interest as he was thinking with his heart rather than his brain or wallet. Dear Brainless Fuckwit, please understand the concept of a separate legal personality of a company. A company director who also happens to be a super-majority shareholder is STILL required to act in the best interest of the company and not treat it as his personal toy. And when a company accepts other people's money for investment, it better damn well make sure that the money goes where the investor was led to believe it would go. The legal and financial illiteracy of some -- if anyone needed confirmation that NZ is a third world country, this should provide the final proof. |
3rd September 2011, 15:09 | #78 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Allan Hubbard killed in head-on car crash
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10749145
Suicide by Hilux? "Seniors moment" behind the wheel? Unfortunate accident? A comment from me on Aug 29 last year: Quote:
|
|
3rd September 2011, 15:28 | #79 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
3rd September 2011, 15:58 | #80 | |
|
Quote:
|
|