|
6th February 2009, 10:31 | #1 |
|
Battlefield 1943 - Trailer
|
6th February 2009, 12:27 | #2 |
Down but not out!
|
smiles and plots to get a better system..
__________________
Body Count Gibb'in Since '82 |
6th February 2009, 13:00 | #3 |
|
Looking awesome!
Fuck yeah DICE, you made the right choice |
6th February 2009, 15:31 | #4 |
|
Looks like BF1942 with updated graphics.
Awesome BUT.. if you read the About it says "Play with 24 Players online in three beautiful and destructible locations" Only 24? suckage. Slightly OT.. but WTF happened to that 3erd person cartoonie BF game they were making? I haven't heard or seen anything of that in ages. |
6th February 2009, 15:38 | #5 |
|
Yeah that sucks big actually... hopefully a console only player limit and more maps are to be announced
|
6th February 2009, 15:48 | #6 | |
|
Quote:
http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/57078 |
|
6th February 2009, 17:02 | #7 |
Mate, feed, kill, repeat
|
Sweet!
TF2 is great but I miss vehicles. I hope they don't screw this up. |
6th February 2009, 17:36 | #8 |
|
Awwww fuck yes.
The weeks worth of hours I lost playing the '42 demo on Wake Island alone. My worry is that they'll EA'ize it and make loadouts and classes more like CoD 4 and CoD:world at war :/ secretly waits for the next eve of destruction and desert combat
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ Last edited by Cyberbob : 6th February 2009 at 17:38. |
6th February 2009, 17:47 | #9 |
|
bring on the bugs.
|
6th February 2009, 17:58 | #10 |
.
|
There is one thing that will make or break this game.
Destroyers. They need fully fledged naval equipment back in, that's what turned tides in 1942 and that's why WI/Iwo etc were so damn fun. I saw some carriers but couldn't see any AA guns on them or anything, not sure what the sunken ship was but it didn't look like it was a previously playable one. I just really, really hope they put naval force back in. |
6th February 2009, 20:20 | #11 |
|
They dupe the 1942 demo, and thats all I need.
|
6th February 2009, 21:33 | #12 |
|
Damm, just when I thought my gaming days were over.
|
6th February 2009, 23:47 | #13 |
|
Wow, PC, PS3 and 360.
Now if only cross plat gaming was more than just a marketing myth. Wonder what this is going to cost being a download rather than retail game. |
7th February 2009, 00:09 | #14 |
|
Left edit a little late, Battlefield Bad Company 2 will be available on PC this time around too.
|
7th February 2009, 10:32 | #15 |
|
I've heard $20USD being thrown around as a possible price. I'd pay that for Wake Island alone, the other two maps are nice bonuses.
|
7th February 2009, 11:19 | #16 | |
Jedi Knight
|
Quote:
bring on a game that DOESN'T have bugs |
|
7th February 2009, 11:40 | #17 | |
|
Ruh-roh Raggy
http://kotaku.com/5148080/battlefiel...needed-upgrade
Quote:
|
|
7th February 2009, 11:51 | #18 |
|
well thats that game a pile of shit before it even gets released.
console kiddies pleased yet again. |
7th February 2009, 12:17 | #19 |
|
Hot tip, 95% of gamers don't want a hardcore game. They just want to have fun.
__________________
18/12/08 - Nevar Forget |
7th February 2009, 12:47 | #20 | |
|
Quote:
Their idea of unlimited ammo/less class definition is off putting but it's probably catering to those who want a quick nostalgic trip without a lot of hassle. It might be a little fun, who knows. |
|
7th February 2009, 12:48 | #21 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
7th February 2009, 12:51 | #22 |
|
Provide a SDK and the modders will fix this shit up.
__________________
He sleeps. Sock. Bar of soap. Bang bang bang! Brain damage. Corn field. Gun. *pchew* Funeral |
7th February 2009, 13:10 | #23 |
|
It looks like the carrier is static, as in BF2. Also the bombers don't look like they're manned: they're probably called by smoke or something and just fly over and drop bombs. All I see is infantry, tanks, jeeps, planes and some AA.
It looks pretty, but it's been consolified (consolidated?) No destroyers, battleships, subs, bombers, divebombers, torpedo bombers, halftracks, mobile artillery... all the stuff that made BF1942 so flexible and fun.
__________________
Aperture Science: We do what we must, because we can. |
7th February 2009, 13:42 | #24 |
|
DICE have said in the past they won't ignore the hardcore crowd... BF3 may still be somewhere in the pipeline
|
7th February 2009, 20:48 | #25 |
Mmm... Sacrilicious
|
42 catered for noobs and pros alike without dumbing shit down. I lament the direction gaming is heading - we'll see pc gamers having to turn at gamepad speeds shortly...
|
8th February 2009, 01:05 | #26 |
|
oh fuckn awesome fukn woo fukn yeah YAYS!
hopefully no 'add-on packs' this time.
__________________
yadda |
8th February 2009, 01:57 | #27 |
|
The dev walk through on GT shows that while flying seems fine, the action on the ground didnt survive. Pitty really. If it was 1942 with a new engine id buy.
|
8th February 2009, 15:43 | #28 |
|
Does no one else think that only 24people 12 a side online is a large backwards step?
That one thing puts me right off. I can't really enjoy one on linefps unless they have a min of 15 peeps a side. More people = more chaos = more fun. But thats just me. 32player a side BF was just.. THE SHIT. |
8th February 2009, 20:41 | #29 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2009, 11:42 | #30 | |
Here be dragons
|
Quote:
__________________
Peace. |
|
9th February 2009, 12:15 | #31 | |
Nothing to See Here!
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2009, 16:13 | #32 | |
|
Quote:
BF1942: hide in flimsy hut and survive carpet bombing BF1943: hide in flimsy hut and be vaporised |
|
9th February 2009, 16:32 | #33 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2009, 16:56 | #34 |
|
What do you mean, "usually"?
Point is that 1943 will NOT be the same as 1942, regardless of whether you like destruction or not (not liking destruction, that doesn't making one bit of sense to me) |
9th February 2009, 17:08 | #35 |
|
BF1943 is BF1942 for schmucks
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/45234.html that makes me fuckign angry. it looks so awesome just fuck. make it like 42 with squads and more detailed environments. FUCK
__________________
He sleeps. Sock. Bar of soap. Bang bang bang! Brain damage. Corn field. Gun. *pchew* Funeral |
9th February 2009, 17:08 | #36 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2009, 17:13 | #37 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2009, 17:21 | #38 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2009, 17:32 | #39 |
|
The demo never got updated though did it?
|
9th February 2009, 17:38 | #40 | |
|
Quote:
|
|