NZGames.com Forums
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NZGames.com Forums > General > Open Discussion > Politics
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd April 2009, 13:58     #281
Baal
 
It's true .....







.... thus far.
__________________
Your a homo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 14:02     #282
Reformed_Quint
 
God chubby irritates the hell out of me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 14:45     #283
Draco T Bastard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ab
It is however almost certainly true.
It may be true but that doesn't mean that he's right.

The simple reality is that competitive markets are far more expensive than monopolies. In some cases such added expense is good in others (health is one of them) it's better to have a monopoly. I'm with Friedman on that score - if it's better to have a monopoly then it's best that it's a state/society owned one.
__________________
Cheers
Draco T Bastard
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 14:52     #284
Hurtuso
 
Laugh

Quote:
Originally Posted by ?>Superman
Draco do you shampoo your Leninbeard?
lolz
__________________
yadda
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 15:25     #285
Juju
get to da choppa
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chubby
and what im saying is- why no fanfare?
a historic wrong has been put right.

Because we knew exactly what was coming for several months now. It's been talked about to death already (Maybe not necessarily in this thread, but in the general populous).

So... we're in to the second day of lower taxes. How's everyone doing? We coping? Shall we talk about it some?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 15:31     #286
Saladin
Nothing to See Here!
 
I dont get my tax cut till the 15th! What an injustice!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 15:36     #287
Reformed_Quint
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juju
Because we knew exactly what was coming for several months now. It's been talked about to death already (Maybe not necessarily in this thread, but in the general populous).

So... we're in to the second day of lower taxes. How's everyone doing? We coping? Shall we talk about it some?
~$20 extra a week, will buy an extra box of castlepoint for the weekend. Might buy a tinny instead, yet to be decided, good times ahead though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 15:37     #288
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
Hey, I get nothing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 15:46     #289
StN
I have detailed files
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ab
Hey, I get nothing!
I call shennanigans - What about Rudd's stimulus packages...

You musta been offered free ceiling insulation?

Last edited by StN : 2nd April 2009 at 15:51.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 15:47     #290
gentle
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ab
Hey, I get nothing!
We got Liz Shaw, you can have her back now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 16:25     #291
adonis
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Teapot
I think he hit the nail on the head.
The point you made earlier was that the increase in levies was due to the fact that there's no user pays componant to the service ACC provides. That issue is somewhat separate from the issue of privatisation. Although privatisation would inevitably lead to user pays, it's not necessary to do the opposite under a state monopoly. They're not tied unless you believe that "the left" would oppose the idea on ideological grounds without examining the potential benefits of it, and that "the right" would oppose a user pays state monopoly on similar grounds. A somewhat pessimistic view, but understandable in all honesty.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 19:36     #292
Hemebond
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by StN
You musta been offered free ceiling insulation?
National axed it because it was "impractical". Instead National are going to build new gas power plants and heat the whole planet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 20:00     #293
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
He's talking about the Australian Labor government's stimulus package. And as a matter of fact, I probably will take up their offer of free ceiling insulation
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 20:13     #294
Golden Teapot
Love, Actuary
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by adonis
Although privatisation would inevitably lead to user pays...
I'll be very surprised indeed if privitisation extends to all of the ACC accounts. Last time it was just he employer's account - I expect it will be the same next time; assuming htere is a next time.

And, as for the big car registration increases that are coming. Why the hell aren;t the big premiums being paid by the big risk drivers?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2009, 20:45     #295
madmaxii
 
GT - I suspect, that given the past record of ACC, they would find it difficult - neh impossible, to work out who the high risk drivers were.
__________________
Carpe Diem
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 13:13     #296
ZoSo
 
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/n...ectid=10565827

Gets better by the day. Systematically destroying Labour's relevance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 13:48     #297
crocos
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoSo
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/n...ectid=10565827

Gets better by the day. Systematically destroying Labour's relevance.
Content of that article = nil

How do you see that as putting even a single nail in Labour's coffin? Of course the Greens were going to have conversations with National. Hell, LABOUR is having conversations with National. It's how ideas are shared and policy formed.
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N

وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 13:51     #298
ZoSo
 
Jeez, couldn't you let chubby go troppo in here before making some sense.

Way to ruin it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 14:33     #299
Juju
get to da choppa
 
I was having a discussion the other day.

What do the backbenchers that weren't voted in by electorate vote (rather by party vote) in the labour party actually do all day?
Seriously, what do they do? They have no power, they have no electorate to look after, they're not ministers. Wtf do they do apart from take shots at National during discussion sessions?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 14:39     #300
Saladin
Nothing to See Here!
 
One would assume they do the same as National list backbenchers..
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 14:41     #301
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
Well no, because the National list backbenchers are members of a caucus that determines the Prime Minister of the country and decides on overall government policy. They're THE GOVERNMENT.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 14:53     #302
Saladin
Nothing to See Here!
 
Yeah but the opposition backbenchers would also frame party policy - they just don't get to introduce it into law, and instead just use it for toilet paper :P

There's also select committees etc
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 16:49     #303
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
OK, so John Key has in the space of a couple of weeks

a) sent Helen Clark overseas
b) shuffled Michael Cullen not only out of Parliament but to a position in which he is effectively gagged
c) made Judith Tizard the face of the Labour Party
d) done a deal to gain support of the Greens

The man's got game.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 17:16     #304
Hory
 
I didn't realise John Key is also the UN Secretary General.

And a "deal to gain support of the Greens" is nothing of the sort, the agreement says the Greens will "consider facilitating government legislation via procedural support on a case by case basis".
They are still going to vote against the Government on confidence and supply.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 17:27     #305
crocos
 
Hory, I'm disappointed you rose to such an obvious troll.
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N

وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 17:46     #306
Ab
A mariachi ogre snorkel
 
Quote:
Greens deal means National back as the natural party of government

In a deal unthinkable pre-John Key, the Prime Minister has reached across the aisle and signed a memorandum of understanding with the Green Party, and has already started work on some joint initiatives.

The deal proposes a framework around which the two parties can work together to develop policy and legislation in areas of common interest.

John Key signed the document with Green co-leaders Jeanette Fitzsimons and Russel Norman today.

Under the terms of the agreement, both parties will retain their independence, and the right to speak on any issue freely. Both parties claim it is not based on any prerequisite policy agreements.

It is not a supply and confidence agreement, but its stated intent is to establish a “good faith working agreement.”

The deal sees the Greens gaining access to government ministers, appropriate departmental officials for both briefings and advice as well as input in to the ministerial decision making process, including cabinet papers.

In return the Greens will be asked to “consider facilitating government legislation via procedural support on a case by case basis.”
...
Minister of Energy and Resources, Gerry Brownlee, will also work with Ms Fitzsimons on the implementation, timing, and funding of energy efficiency measures that the Government wishes to advance. This will include the development of an updated and revised New Zealand Energy Strategy, and the updated Energy and Efficiency and Conservation Strategy.
National has pulled off a coup. Labour is basically a rump now - it has no leadership, it has no policies, and Key has spiked it on privatisation by appointing Cullen to an SOE. It's basically the only party left that doesn't have a voice in government.

A cynical observer (and I'm not one, nosirree) might entertain the notion that what National is doing here is trying to polarise the Green Party into "environmentalists" and "far-left social policy activists", using the former and ridiculing the latter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 18:11     #307
Tranquil^
 
John Key strikes me as no more than some dime a dozen pretend politician who can now tick the "be prime minister" box on his list of things to do before dieing. The insignificance of this man will be revealed once he leaves office. A male Jenny Shipley springs to mind.

I personally have more faith in that guy across the ditch with the queer haircut. I wonder if we can organize a swap? Like the whole Steve Price for Russell Crow deal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 21:30     #308
Golden Teapot
Love, Actuary
 
There's the sweet scent of a second term on the air already.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2009, 22:52     #309
SpaceCowboy
Here be dragons
 
can i touch john keys penis as well?

actually, i am happy hes dealing with the greens, but i just hope its not just words.
__________________
Peace.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2009, 22:07     #310
chubby
 
i dont like the boomers much myself- but stop picking on them already...

Quote:
DPF agrees, cancelling Cullen Fund rips off NZ
http://www.thestandard.org.nz/dpf-ag...d-rips-off-nz/
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2009, 22:11     #311
Spink
 
cool story bro
__________________
Weak hearts I rip.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2009, 22:12     #312
CCS
Stunt Pants
 
Chubby, do you have any original thoughts of your own? Or do you just take all your cues from blogs?
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2009, 22:16     #313
madmaxii
 
He didn't deny it when I suggested he owned The Standard - but yes - he's a fuckwit.
__________________
Carpe Diem
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 06:59     #314
chubby
 
Laugh

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCS
Chubby, do you have any original thoughts of your own? Or do you just take all your cues from blogs?
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 07:55     #315
Hurtuso
 
laugh it up fuzzball
__________________
yadda
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 11:08     #316
?>Superman
 
Looks like he had no real comeback so he instead chose to do the old "lols i'm so just like laughin it off" but really he's crying like a well-beaten foster child from Uruguay.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 11:13     #317
Baal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Teapot
There's the sweet scent of a second term on the air already.
__________________
Your a homo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 19:20     #318
chubby
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCS
Chubby, do you have any original thoughts of your own? Or do you just take all your cues from blogs?
i do have a few, but your inference that you'd be less of a cunt if i posted my own words is (from experience) a crock, gained over the few years ive posted,and the many ive lurked.
usual pattern.
1. chubby(or other pinko) posts
2. ccs (or other brownshirt) throws abuse.
3. echo chamber guards pitch in.
4. ...........

so whatever....
links turn out to be a quick,easy way to get on your tits. 8-)

(ps- keep the beard, it makes your lips look less girlie.)
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 19:28     #319
ZoSo
 
5. JP or adonis fleshes out chubby's blog regurgitation, chubby realises he really should have come up with that himself. Chubby then pats them on the back and makes some lame comment *again* about no-one on the right bothering to discuss politics with a partisan hack like himself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2009, 19:40     #320
chubby
 
nah. i talk politics with plenty of wingnuts(you could almost say it's my job). just none of the 20something lamers that form the core community here.
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way."
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



© Copyright NZGames.com 1996-2024
Site paid for by members (love you guys)