|
30th September 2010, 17:06 | #41 |
.
|
Well I dunno about you but I can't grow McDonalds in my back yard like I do with fruit and veg. It isn't that expensive if you take a positive action towards it~
|
30th September 2010, 17:18 | #42 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
30th September 2010, 17:35 | #43 | |
|
Quote:
Hell, they pay for insulation schemes why not have a vege garden building scheme.
__________________
Later Boltz! |
|
30th September 2010, 17:59 | #44 | ||
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
||
30th September 2010, 18:05 | #45 |
|
__________________
Later Boltz! |
30th September 2010, 18:14 | #46 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Rocket is feeling...
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
30th September 2010, 18:17 | #47 |
|
Making healthy food cheaper won't help solve the problem with fatties being fat. I worked at Mangere Mcdonalds when I was a teenager. The amount of money people spent there was stupid. They'd take the whanau and easily spend $50. Oh, and they were all black (or brown if that's what you call an Pacific Islander, Mari)
|
30th September 2010, 18:29 | #48 |
|
It certainly is not expensive to eat healthy - it just takes more physical effort to cook up a decent stir fry than to shovel chocolates into your mouth
|
30th September 2010, 18:35 | #49 |
Stunt Pants
|
I wonder what the state of Home Economics in school is these days. Everyone did it at my intermediate school and I don't remember a lot about it. I guess I must have learnt some basics of how to cook stuff and they probably showed us the food pyramid and shit like that.
Does anyone know if all schools do Home Economics these days and do they make kids learn useful recipes?
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
30th September 2010, 22:11 | #50 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
30th September 2010, 23:55 | #51 | ||
Stunt Pants
|
Allow myselves to regurgitate writings from Russell Brown:
Quote:
This nonsense about 'making fruit and veg more accessible' is just an empty catchphrase. It's plenty accessible. The fact that a bucket of reconstituted giblets from KFC is relatively cheaper than fruit and veges grown in mother earth's own soil doesn't mean shit except that chicken processing plants can't charge much for the leftovers. Quote:
fixed_truth, surely you can see this idea for what it is: desperation. It's a policy that Labour itself has rubbished and does not believe in. It's a pretty clear sign that they are so desperate that they will say and do anything at the moment to lift their polling. I know you'd have a hard time accepting that though. Labour are the tellers of truth and National are the liars who don't care about the people. But try to look past the end of your nose.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
||
1st October 2010, 07:43 | #52 | |
|
Quote:
There's a few places out souf where wifey and I go over summer to buy big beefsteak tomatoes also for about 70c a kg. It's run operated and run by the IHC society. The workers look after the plants and you just have to pick them from the vine. There isn't any excuse to say 'pies are cheeper than carrots bru' in South AK. |
|
1st October 2010, 08:08 | #53 |
Stunt Pants
|
There you have it. Veges are cheap and they're accessible. Problem solved.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
1st October 2010, 09:16 | #54 | |
|
Quote:
I said in my first post on this topic that I'm not convinced yet, but all I've heard so far from opponents is ideological whining removed from the research & case-studies we have as a practice guide.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
1st October 2010, 09:23 | #55 |
Stunt Pants
|
So that's all that matters, right? Fuck the practicalities, fuck whether it is even necessary. Take off GST and a WHOLE EXTRA FUCKING 11% - THAT'S ELEVEN PERCENT - WORTH OF FRUIT AND VEGES WILL BE SOLD! Fuck me sideways!
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
1st October 2010, 10:48 | #56 | |
|
Quote:
A necessary component of doing something about this (ie, making changes in peoples health and lifestyle choices) is increasing their consumption of fruit & veg. 11% isn't something to scoff at, shit my tax cut gain today (after GST increase) is probably less than 1%! But yeah there very well could be practicality problems if it's not legislated properly. Though we're one of the last developed countries to implement this exemption so it shouldn't be too hard to learn what works & what doesn't from the rest.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
1st October 2010, 12:10 | #57 |
Stunt Pants
|
See, I thought you weren't yet convinced but it sounds to me like you've made up your mind. You seem to think that an 11% increase is worth the impracticalities of implementation and that any reasons against this are just 'ideological whining'. Great shit
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
1st October 2010, 12:41 | #58 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
1st October 2010, 13:05 | #59 | |
get to da choppa
|
Quote:
So the owner of a supermarket that turns over 10's of millions a year isn't allowed to spend $200 a week on his garden that probably doesn't have town water? Irrelevant of how much GP the store makes - do you really think the owner of such a business should stick to a $45k salary just so he can be like you? What a dick. |
|
1st October 2010, 13:10 | #60 | |
|
Quote:
But don't worry, Labour aren't getting into power for at least another 4-years so it's not going to happen unless there there is a strong majority of public opinion for it (then National would be claiming as their idea).
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
1st October 2010, 13:57 | #61 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
1st October 2010, 14:32 | #62 |
|
Is that a rhetorical question or what?
That was 6-years ago when Cullen was still around, GST was only 12.5% then, also he wasn't talking in context of removing GST on just fruit & veg. Plus since then there's been research indicating it's a good idea. Maybe Cullen still thinks it's a bad idea, but is it relevant? Maybe we should ask Don Brash?
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
1st October 2010, 14:41 | #63 | |
|
Quote:
laaaawwwwll.
__________________
Later Boltz! Last edited by Rocket : 1st October 2010 at 14:45. |
|
1st October 2010, 15:01 | #64 |
|
^^Someone should really buy the vege's that are in season shouldn't they?
|
1st October 2010, 15:39 | #65 | |
get to da choppa
|
Quote:
And the last avo's I bought were from Shelly beach, a bag of like 10 for $5. |
|
1st October 2010, 16:03 | #66 |
|
i cant find a quote for cost of water delivery in that area but basic stats are 1000 litres per hour for sprinkling garden.
http://www.rainwaterstoragetank.com.au/faq multiply that for a multi million dollar beach front home, certainly not your average gardens based on soil on sand. times that by few hours every day. On top of probably and already over used cycle, boat washing, kids, showers usual summer holiday activity use of water. and you'll get of an idea of the amount of water he uses, and yes its absurd, the reason I brought it to light in the first place. stop being a keyboard warrior trying to prove everyone wrong, maybe you just cannot imagine. im sure your mother told you to take a 2 minutes shower at the holiday bach running on a 100 litre rain fed water tank.
__________________
Later Boltz! Last edited by Rocket : 1st October 2010 at 16:04. |
1st October 2010, 16:05 | #67 |
|
Aha Rocket
Pot Black
__________________
Carpe Diem |
1st October 2010, 16:19 | #68 | |
Anas Latrina
|
Quote:
If you like Labour's other policies then that's cool, but going on about a possible 11% (OMG!!!!!11111onelol) increase in fruit like its the best thing ever makes you look like an idiot (ad hominem exaggeration... meh it's Friday). It is another dumb populist opposition policy. It sounds great on TV - I mean fresh fruit and vegetables for christs sake!!! - but isn't worth introducing complexity to our simplest tax. |
|
1st October 2010, 16:30 | #69 |
|
Yeah, I think as a stand-alone policy, it isn't worth squat.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
1st October 2010, 16:59 | #70 | |
get to da choppa
|
Quote:
I'm still waiting on an answer to my question about if you think he should be bought down a more normal income, btw. So the guy uses a lot of water - we have lots of it and he is paying the going market rate for this privilege - what's the problem? |
|
1st October 2010, 17:05 | #71 |
|
umm are u bat shit crazy? we were talking about greed by super markets and them dialing up prices 3 weeks after tax cut on veges to soak the profit..
Now can you fuck off and die?
__________________
Later Boltz! |
1st October 2010, 17:25 | #72 | |
|
Quote:
eating healthy is cheaper than eating shit. this isn't even an arguement, it's a fact. food shopping is only expensive if you are one of the many idiots packing their trolley with premium brand processed shit. the basic stuff- fruit, veges, meats, dairy, bread, can be easily and cheaply found if you spend a bit of time. meat would be the most expensive on that list by a longshot (which is fucking retarded in this country but go figure) but sticking to specials and so on helps negate that. my average with clients so far when it comes to cutting their food bill each week is somewhere between 25-30% (i actually havent bothered recording results for that for the last year but i doubt it would have changed much) simply by following some very basic rules and patterns on a shopping trip. As far as the idea of getting rid of GST on frsh produce, yeah its retarded for a bunch of reasons that have been done in other countries, labour really needs some new material. |
|
1st October 2010, 17:34 | #73 |
|
Just as an aside I've come to assume that specials are the price food can afford to be sold at and the regular price is the owners of supermarkets wanting to get rich. Like most other people.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
1st October 2010, 17:45 | #74 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
As stated in a previous comment or link that I CBF citing, the difference between "fruit and veg with GST" and "fruit and veg without GST" is nothing compared to the difference between "fruit and veg at the big-name supermarket" and "fruit and veg at a market or greengrocers".
You get fucked on every item in a supermarket, it's a laziness tax. |
1st October 2010, 18:09 | #75 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
||
1st October 2010, 18:13 | #76 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
1st October 2010, 19:40 | #77 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية |
|
1st October 2010, 20:00 | #78 | |
|
Quote:
Ab's point was that fruit & veg are cheaper at the greengrocers and the extra money you pay at the supermarket for not being bothered to shop around - is like a 'laziness tax'. My point is that these lazy people will be getting less fruit & veg for their money and so will be more likely to be less healthy and thus need more health care in the future. http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/...41102472586299
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
1st October 2010, 20:56 | #79 |
|
Rocket - I thought people were mean calling you dumb.
I've changed my mind. Have a happy day
__________________
Carpe Diem |
1st October 2010, 21:37 | #80 |
|
I knew that ages ago
Referring to 2degrees extending their coverage: http://www.nzgames.com/forums/showpo...7&postcount=27 Rocket giving his all-knowing feedback on Woosh broadband (it was clearly stated at the start of the thread that the OP was seeking feedback on their wired service): http://www.nzgames.com/forums/showpo...16&postcount=4 I could go on, but I won't |