|
11th February 2015, 19:36 | #41 | |
|
Quote:
Pixie
__________________
Civilised is as civilised does and civilised people walk among us. |
|
11th February 2015, 19:38 | #42 |
|
Yeah, that. I should refresh before replying...
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. Last edited by Lightspeed : 11th February 2015 at 19:39. |
11th February 2015, 19:41 | #43 |
Stunt Pants
|
So the Greens are finding scientists that support their point of view and that's okay why?
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
11th February 2015, 19:50 | #44 |
|
I guess the same reason as it's okay for John Key, as it apparently is. Can you tell me why? Or is it a poor use of tax payers money in that case too?
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
11th February 2015, 20:03 | #45 | ||
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11th February 2015, 20:06 | #46 |
|
I guess in the pick between an inept and a cynical approach to science, cynical wins, eh?
The thing is, there's some difference between Browning and Key and their roles in their respective parties. I just... can't quite put my finger on it. Hrmm?
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
11th February 2015, 20:13 | #47 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
11th February 2015, 20:17 | #48 |
|
No, the sarcastic rhetoric is to demonstrate how bankrupt your principles are in this case.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
11th February 2015, 20:17 | #49 |
Stunt Pants
|
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
11th February 2015, 20:26 | #50 |
|
Good talk.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
11th February 2015, 21:21 | #51 |
Stunt Pants
|
Cool rhetoric.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
12th February 2015, 01:22 | #52 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية |
|
12th February 2015, 10:51 | #53 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
12th February 2015, 13:03 | #54 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
12th February 2015, 14:06 | #55 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
12th February 2015, 14:31 | #56 |
Stunt Pants
|
The Green Party, reinforcing their 'Anti-Science Loonies' image since aaaaages ago.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
12th February 2015, 15:33 | #57 |
|
Nonsense. The Greens are bad science (at least their lower list members are.) National are anti-science.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
12th February 2015, 17:29 | #58 | |
|
Quote:
Pixie
__________________
Civilised is as civilised does and civilised people walk among us. |
|
12th February 2015, 21:32 | #59 |
|
or non-buisness-led and controlled science.
lets not forget controlled. if buisness thinks it's ok,then it must be. science becomes deabateble.
__________________
"Take four red capsules, in ten minutes-take two more. Help is on the way." |
13th February 2015, 04:23 | #60 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
I am the walrus
Goo goo ja joob |
28th May 2015, 18:26 | #61 | ||||
Stunt Pants
|
Greens' co-leadership race: James Shaw rejects criticism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Good on the Greens for realising they have to broaden their appeal, but I can't believe it's come to this, with the homo accusing the other guy of being too metro. What in the fuck.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
||||
28th May 2015, 18:49 | #62 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Kevin "of course some of our members are anti-vaccination, we're a broad church" Hague.
|
28th May 2015, 19:24 | #63 |
Stunt Pants
|
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
29th May 2015, 11:47 | #64 |
|
If you look back at the original Greens leadership (Donald & Fitzsimons) it was more focused on the environmental issues.
When it changed to Norman & Turei, it appears to have focused more on the social agendas. If they elect Shaw, it would appear on paper that they may have a foot back in both camps. If they elect Hague, it's more of the same that really hasn't got them anywhere. The only time the Greens have ever been effective was when they took an electorate seat in 1999 and became part of the government. Since then they have been shafted (2005), over looked and in my opinion have become rather radicalised, which is probably why the other main parties struggle to work with them.
__________________
Spig. Last edited by spigalau : 29th May 2015 at 11:49. |
30th May 2015, 15:43 | #65 |
|
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
30th May 2015, 18:27 | #66 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
|
1st June 2015, 13:00 | #67 |
|
Good to see Climate Change being a bit more of a priority:
|
1st June 2015, 13:15 | #68 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Yeah, because up to now the Greens haven't given a shit about it.
|
23rd July 2015, 14:01 | #69 |
|
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
23rd July 2015, 15:09 | #70 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
23rd July 2015, 20:09 | #71 |
|
I wonder what proportion of religious people prefer to avoid voting for non-religious politicians if they can avoid it?
|
23rd July 2015, 21:20 | #72 |
Stuff
|
Yeah don't think it matters. However NZ has half a million Catholics that are about to turn green, if they follow their leader.
__________________
My degree of sarcasm depends on your degree of stupidity. |
23rd July 2015, 21:25 | #73 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
|
|
12th August 2015, 12:50 | #74 |
|
Can someone explain to me how they blocked ACTs bill about the hours that Bars allowed to open?
Was it some special bill that needed 100% approval to advance? |
12th August 2015, 15:03 | #75 |
Stunt Pants
|
I dunno how it works either, but srsly tho.... what a bunch of miserable cunts the Greens are.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
12th August 2015, 15:11 | #76 |
|
What? The Greens are cutting funding to desperately needed public services?
Oh, no, something about popular sports. Figures.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
12th August 2015, 15:15 | #77 |
|
meh~
Last edited by Savage : 12th August 2015 at 15:18. |
12th August 2015, 15:26 | #78 |
Stunt Pants
|
Come on Savage, don't edit that. What you said was on point.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
12th August 2015, 15:40 | #79 |
|
"Mah sports! What cunts!"
"Raped traumatised women raising their children alone! At least we have a surplus!"
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
12th August 2015, 15:45 | #80 |
|
"The bill will be shot down if any MP refuses to grant leave. Mr Seymour was confident it would progress,"
|