|
8th February 2011, 19:50 | #41 |
|
Well, the context seemed to be a value laden fantasy about what to do with the poor who have "too many" children.
So yeah, maybe I missed that.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
8th February 2011, 20:11 | #42 |
|
I don't know why you're putting speech marks around 'too many children' because that is exactly what is happening, and it is an unfair burden on society.
We're asked to be sustainable when it comes to the Earth's resources, I can't see any reason why it shouldn't be the same for population. |
8th February 2011, 21:04 | #43 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
8th February 2011, 21:21 | #44 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
|
8th February 2011, 21:59 | #45 |
Stunt Pants
|
I've already gone over this. It contributes to the number of people living in poverty and perpetuates the cycle of poverty.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
8th February 2011, 23:17 | #46 |
|
Yeah, that sounds like the kind of braindead thing you'd say.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
9th February 2011, 00:03 | #47 |
Stunt Pants
|
Going to explain that?
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
9th February 2011, 09:21 | #48 |
|
In a hostile environment families tend to have many children to covers losses, disease, famine, unfenced swimming pools...
|
9th February 2011, 11:25 | #49 | |
Drunken Annoying
Superhero Bastard |
Quote:
__________________
If there is one movement I could get behind in this world, it would be the discrimination and abuse of fucking idiots. |
|
9th February 2011, 11:57 | #50 |
|
So it's the Pimp-X way or the highway all of a sudden?
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
9th February 2011, 11:58 | #51 |
|
I think that LS has some good points.
New Zealand doesn't have an over-population problem, it's more that people don't like their tax dollars supporting other peoples kids. Though what would happen to our population if these lower income families had 0, 1 or 2 kids like families with higher incomes? If we're talking about limiting people to 3 kids should we be looking at making it compulsory for those on higher incomes to have at least 2 kids? We need a steady supply of new kiwi's don't we? What about those 0-1 kid bludgers not contributing to NZ's population? Hmmmmm
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
9th February 2011, 12:02 | #52 | |
|
Quote:
On the other hand, capaitalist economics are based on continual population growth...
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية |
|
9th February 2011, 13:42 | #53 | |
Drunken Annoying
Superhero Bastard |
Quote:
You suffer from a severe case of "I'll interpret all things the way I want to, rather than the way they are expressed". Also, just because you can think doesn't mean you think anything worthwhile. Just because you can speak doesn't mean you should. For fucks sake, CLUE UP OR SHUT UP.
__________________
If there is one movement I could get behind in this world, it would be the discrimination and abuse of fucking idiots. |
|
9th February 2011, 14:08 | #54 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
9th February 2011, 14:09 | #55 | |
Mmm... Sacrilicious
|
Quote:
It's not that hard of a concept to grasp. |
|
9th February 2011, 14:19 | #56 | |
|
Quote:
IIRC from reading Stats NZ press releases NZ still has a steady inward migration positive figure even though that has dropped. |
|
9th February 2011, 14:21 | #57 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. Last edited by fixed_truth : 9th February 2011 at 14:25. |
||
9th February 2011, 14:24 | #58 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
9th February 2011, 14:31 | #59 |
SLUTS!!!!!!!
|
has Sue Bradford got nothing better to do?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4636...etition-appals (and LOL at Stuff's spelling error in the URL/page title)
__________________
Slow internet is worse than no internet. It's like putting your penis in once and then being required to make out for 2 hours --Matt "The Oatmeal" Inman |
9th February 2011, 14:45 | #60 | |
Mmm... Sacrilicious
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2011, 14:48 | #61 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
I hope you're not going to do a classic Lolspeed trick and start arguing about what we're arguing about.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
9th February 2011, 15:34 | #62 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
||
9th February 2011, 15:35 | #63 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
9th February 2011, 15:42 | #64 |
|
.
|
9th February 2011, 15:44 | #65 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2011, 15:52 | #66 |
|
No I'm saying that it's very difficult to have kids without Govt. assistance when you're on a low income.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
9th February 2011, 16:02 | #67 |
|
So you're saying you can't have children on a low income?
|
9th February 2011, 16:10 | #68 | |
|
Quote:
to present an extreme analogy, why not subsidise people on low incomes who buy a boat then? |
|
9th February 2011, 16:14 | #69 |
|
Children are not consumer goods.
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
9th February 2011, 16:26 | #70 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2011, 16:28 | #71 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
9th February 2011, 16:34 | #72 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2011, 16:41 | #73 |
|
lol this isn't that game on who's line is it anyway where you can only respond in a question.
If you've got an opinion on the matter then speak up.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
9th February 2011, 16:44 | #74 | |
Stunt Pants
|
Quote:
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
|
9th February 2011, 16:56 | #75 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2011, 17:06 | #76 | |
|
Quote:
Moving on.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
|
9th February 2011, 17:12 | #77 |
Stunt Pants
|
The only person who is talking about a limit is you.
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
9th February 2011, 17:13 | #78 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
9th February 2011, 17:19 | #79 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
||
9th February 2011, 17:21 | #80 | |
|
Quote:
That's a dumb idea. |
|