|
17th November 2008, 15:41 | #2 |
Word To Your Motherboard!
|
Ahh, and so it begins. You fools!
|
17th November 2008, 19:00 | #3 |
|
"Taxpayer Bill of Rights" how fucking PATRIOT ACT can you get?
Good thing Labour will repeal it in 3 years, fuck yeah! |
17th November 2008, 21:28 | #4 |
Here be dragons
|
classic right wing behaviour - not suprised.
__________________
Peace. |
17th November 2008, 21:52 | #5 |
|
You guys should organize a support group and each week one of you could bring the cheese for the whine.
|
17th November 2008, 22:17 | #6 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
17th November 2008, 22:40 | #7 |
|
do you?
|
17th November 2008, 22:42 | #8 |
|
yeah, I looked it up. Seems like a sensible idea to me. eliminates the whole "let's use up the budget otherwise we won't get higher budget next year"
|
17th November 2008, 22:44 | #9 |
|
Hey the only other place that's tried it was Colorado and it seems to work fine there oh wai
|
17th November 2008, 22:48 | #10 |
|
oh noes less tax money to the state, how will we cope
|
17th November 2008, 22:48 | #11 |
|
ACT is like your kooky uncle, once in a while he says something insightful, but most of the time he is batshit crazy.
|
17th November 2008, 22:57 | #12 | |
|
Quote:
I only ask because a friend of mine, |
|
17th November 2008, 23:03 | #13 | |
|
Oh yeah, basically this too
Quote:
|
|
17th November 2008, 23:52 | #14 | |
|
Quote:
no, but i remember voucher privitasation and it was awesome. |
|
18th November 2008, 19:21 | #15 |
|
I remember that as well.
Except it was far from awesome :/ Did the people who had those vouchers ever get anything back for them? |
18th November 2008, 19:23 | #16 |
|
yeah we made really good dividends.
|
18th November 2008, 20:38 | #17 |
Love, Actuary
|
Well, we're in for 6 - 9 years of this stuff.
God it's going to be hard to cope with it. Oh, the stuff I'm talking about is the ultra-inane posts that will come from Draco. And, I mean posts far wrose than they once were. Thankfully, I have his posts as read-optional. So, I should be able to cope. |
2nd December 2008, 21:55 | #18 | |
|
Quote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10546176 /duck |
|
2nd December 2008, 22:15 | #19 |
|
Yeah last time it was the BNZ....cunts.
|
3rd December 2008, 11:48 | #20 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
3rd December 2008, 12:13 | #21 |
|
what concerns me is Key saying the NZ gov will have to borrow more! while handing out a tax cut, who does that benefit?
|
3rd December 2008, 12:48 | #22 |
|
Isn't the saying In for a penny, in for a pound?
In the current climate borrowing more is inevitable so why not give the tax payer a bit of relief at the same time? I'm pretty relaxed about this happening TBH. Edit -*comment about flame-retardant suit or something* Last edited by BoyWonder : 3rd December 2008 at 12:50. |
3rd December 2008, 17:20 | #23 |
|
I don't understand, what's the issue with this?
Draco you haven't really explained what your op is about, am I to assume that this is a good thing? |
3rd December 2008, 22:17 | #24 |
|
It was all about trust.
|
4th December 2008, 11:30 | #25 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
4th December 2008, 11:32 | #26 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Your a homo. |
|
19th December 2008, 10:48 | #27 |
|
National party new (old) line - I know that we said we are a new more friendly less conservative National Party that wouldn't go straight towards asset sales and user pays - BUT - the economy is in a really bad shape so . . . we can't afford to invest in certain things - which coincidentally just happen to be former Labour projects
|
19th December 2008, 11:00 | #28 |
|
Considering how badly Labour have shafted the books, I'm surprised it wasn't Bill English stealing the alcohol.
|
19th December 2008, 11:15 | #29 | ||
|
well actually from the horses mouth
Quote:
Quote:
|
||