|
14th November 2011, 16:04 | #1 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Labour open to partnership with Winston if it gets them government
Quote:
|
|
14th November 2011, 16:04 | #2 |
Stunt Pants
|
eww
__________________
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner? |
14th November 2011, 16:07 | #3 |
|
Oh dear
|
14th November 2011, 18:10 | #4 |
|
I can't stand Winston (I won't work with anyone anyway) Peters and would prefer if he wasn't there.
But policy wise, to me it's still more appealing than a vote for National is a vote for Brash, Banks et al.
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
14th November 2011, 18:15 | #5 |
|
I'd take brash and his faggoty little mouth over winston any day, why? Because brash knows no one likes him.
|
14th November 2011, 18:16 | #6 | |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
Quote:
Labour can ONLY get into power by bringing Winston in too. |
|
14th November 2011, 18:37 | #7 |
|
__________________
Protecting your peace is way more important than proving your point. Some people aren't open to cultivating their views. Just let them be wrong. |
14th November 2011, 18:40 | #8 |
A mariachi ogre snorkel
|
I'd rather have Banks in Cabinet than Peters. I'd rather have Sue Bradford than Peters.
|
14th November 2011, 19:16 | #9 | |
|
He wasn't such a bad foreign minister tbh *ducks* Actually his contribution to governing was probably more agreeable than say... Rodney Hide. He's a blowhard who I disagree with 99% of the time but he's mostly harmless when he gets to the levers of power.
Quote:
|
|
15th November 2011, 00:23 | #10 |
|
The correct response from Goff would be something like "Look, if I am left with the options of a National led government or making a deal with Winston Peters, I am going to be in a very difficult position."
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |