Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrTiTus
I would apply Occam's Razor and say the simpler solution of faking the moon landing to get the accolades is easier than to actually send men to the moon in such a short time frame without a hitch.
|
That's a function of your ignorance. If you knew more about the moon landing you would recognise how exceptional the claim that the moon landing was faked is.
The options are grand pervasive conspiracy, like They Live level of conspiracy, that's ongoing. Or the moon landing happened. The moon landing would be easier.
There's a huge volume of public knowledge, more than any one person can truly digest, available about the moon landing. Technology in use today can be traced back to its development during the Apollo program. There any many people with their careers and all the documents, artefacts, memories and most importantly
competency that came with working on the project. Things that would take exceptional effort and
expertise to fake and an ever growing volume of people willing to keep a secret.
To fake the moon landing, yet have it produce all this genuine technical value? To spawn a genuine space industry? And have it all kept secret?
Maybe. Perhaps the CIA's LSD experiments bore more fruit than they let on, something we're all under the sway of now. They must have found something to make them super-smart too, unless I'm delusional about this functional computer and the hyper-complex system it connects to, the infrastructure it depends on.