|
Although, now that I think about it, that quote itself is an aspect of the problem. To understand it you have to know what "paucity" means. That makes it bad communication. If you come to that quote convinced that there IS clear evidence, and you read the quote without knowing what a paucity is, you would come away without having had your position challenged. You might even come away feeling like your beliefs had been - what's the word? - affirmed.
|