Quote:
|
it would be rape unless the defendant could prove it was consensual.
|
Surely this is the crux of the "problem" with rape cases at the moment. How do you prove consent or non-consent? Simply flipping it around doesn't solve that issue and shits all over "innocent until proven guilty".
There's already an assumed guilt by virtue of there being a case in the first place! Irrespective of what people might say, there has to be a doubt created "otherwise why are they on trial?".
Dumb shit is dumb.