Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MadMax
you're really not getting me. it _should_ be wrong, and legally, it is. However the situation with Trump is that it's simply not the case
|
I don't understand what you mean when you say "with Trump is that it's simply not the case". Can you actually back that up in any way? You do realise a judge has already ordered a temporary restraining order on Trump's travel/immigration EO, right? He has ruled that two states have standing to challenge Trump's EO.
Let me say again: you are wrong. Trump's EOs can be overruled.
Quote:
|
did you miss my quote at the end of that post?
|
No I didn't miss that. I responded to it. Did you miss my response? Here it is again:
Another thing I'll point out is that federal judges can't be easily removed from office (executive/legislative/judicial branches and all that entails). Trump can't just up and fire a federal judge because he got into a twitter-rage. That really would be undemocratic.
If you believe that a judge challenging Trumps EO is career suicide, can you explain how exactly that is?
Quote:
|
Sure, it's "subject to judicial review" however my concern is that noone will stand up and challenge him.
|
Did you have any of these concerns with any of Obama's executive orders? Or George Bush's EOs? Or Bill Clinton's EOs? Or Eisenhower? Or Lincoln?