Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ab
CDC: At this time, there is no evidence that animals play a significant role in spreading SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, to people.
|
Be careful, because there are three "weasle words" (phrases) in there.
"At this time" [subject to change]
"there is no evidence" [we are not stating that this is true, just that we don't have data which meets our criteria]
"significant role" [perhaps there have been instances, but they are not numerous]
Which of course, is not me suggesting that the opposite of the statement is true, but it's very carefully phrased. A more reassuring statement would read:
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, cannot be spread to humans via animals.
But here's the funny thing: the official narrative is that SARS-CoV-2 was spread to humans via a bat (an animal).
So now we have two contradictory statements. How do we hold these in our head, and still maintain we are being told the truth?