StN, fair enough. Environment did change, and definitely agree it's hard to get a good measure. Still, we calibrated public health to avoid COVID at all costs, and the end result is more sickness from all causes, and more COVID. So we didn't even achieve that.
More Britons than ever are out of work due to long-term sickness
https://www.spectator.com.au/2022/10...term-sickness/
the long tail.
sidbo, if you're older than 40 your chances of myocarditis from disease is slim to none. If you're younger than 40 (male) the background rate of myocarditis is ~10:100,000, and if you inject mRNA you add 3:15,000 to that.
Multisystemic Cellular Tropism of SARS-CoV-2 in Autopsies of COVID-19 Patients
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394956/
Quote:
|
No overt pathological findings attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection could be recognized outside of the lung .... Myocyte injury was not found in any case.
|
but that study isn't fair for myocarditis risk because all patients were older than 55, and half of them were obese. So it's fair to say their immune system packed it in long ago.
LS, What you describe sounds ideal. Like, too good to be true kind of ideal. I have no doubt policies were
intended to cause least harm, and many people met in boardrooms coming up with great sounding plans. But my god who cares what the intention was when it produced such woeful outcomes.
I wish not acting was an option made freely available to me. And that if I chose to do nothing I wouldn't have to weigh up losing friends, family over some stupid scandal about who does or doesn't transmit disease. I'm good now, out for blood etc etc, but it hasn't been easy. Discrimination is a bitch.