Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sidbo
This wasn't a cover up
|
May I remind you of the story at the time in October of 2020
If these "more than 50 intelligence officials" had seen the information (in order to assess its veracity) and could see it was just "private stolen photos", why wouldn't they say "there is nothing to see here but dick pics" instead of going full "Russian disinformation"? For what reason would leaked data be spun as something other than either embarrassing at best, or compromising at worst?
Does their "Russian disinformation" disinformation not strike you as some sort of deceptive strategy, particularly 2 weeks out from an election, that people might generally refer to as a "cover up"?