Quote:
|
Originally Posted by adonis
The salary numbers look a lot more realistic than what AB quoted earlier. Generally I believe something if the evidence matches the magnitude of the claim being made, those figures were ridiculous and the idea that the union would turn down a 10% payrise but take a 2.5% payrise should be a giant indication to anyone that there's more here than meets the eye.
|
Yep hearing the Unions side it sure looks like PoA are trying to reduce their overall wage expense and in the context of reduced hours - a 10% pay rise achieves this. The Unions want to keep the shift arrangements and a 2.5% pay increase.