View Single Post
Old 18th July 2010, 22:37     #74
cyc
Objection!
 
By and large I don't think Shocker is wrong on many of the things he wrote, except for the exceptionally cheap jibes at the judges of the Employment Court (having spent years working for judges I tend to find that a proverbial gear-grinder) and his rather shallow understanding of s 103A and a few connected fundamental concepts.

Since I don't otherwise have a very significant attachment for this issue one way or another, I am bowing out of this.
  Reply With Quote