View Single Post
Old 20th November 2007, 18:31     #43
Hannibal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fixed_truth
it seems people have latched onto a bit of partial hearsay here.

the bill aims to regulate the spending on political campaigning by registered interest groups, and also on how much parties can spend on campaigning - not what joe public does.

with any bill there's always gonna be a pedantic focus on perceived loopholes to take the focus away from the bills actual intention

as for people not being able to protest, express political opinions in e-mails & forum sites/blogs, campaigning by parties in election year etc etc - this is simply not true - and this evident if read the amended bill

*AB i believe what you cited refers to 'PAID advertising' rather than the opinions of individuals* (thats what this is all about)
It looks to me like they are being pro-active based on what has happened in the US. US elections are bought, there is no denying that whatsoever. I say good riddance to that.
  Reply With Quote