You couldn't say that several posts ago? Holy shit.

Now, place that explanation into the context of your argument. Then struggle to do that for several more pages. Demonstrate to us where in the autism spectrum you sit. Then have a whine about ad hominem.

Including them or excluding them doesn't change my argument at all. Most of the countries that are below NZ on the emission-per-capita ladder are third-world shitholes where you wouldn't want to live. The reason they have low carbon emissions is they don't have fucking civilisation. It's not like they're managing to achieve something we're not.

Right, including them makes no difference to your argument because your argument fails to make a useful point. That was why I ignored you when you specifically wanted to exclude them in the first place. The point you're making there is irrelevant to my argument if it is true that there are civilised countries below New Zealand on the list. If there are civilised countries below New Zealand on the list then it demonstrates that there is more that New Zealand could be doing. It is true that there are civilised countries below New Zealand on the list. Sweden is a civilised country, which you readily admit. It is below New Zealand on the list. Therefore, there is more that we could be doing as a civilised country. QED.

I could have, but I chose not to. Get rekt bitch.

But I did address the argument - and Nothing quite rightly called me out on it a few posts after.

Also, get a better argument.

I forgot what we were arguing about? I guess it's whether or not we could have done more to address climate change now that window has passed and we're now well on our way to catastrophe?

Are you sure it's not because we're actually not that industrialised? Or that we benefit for non-fossil fuel based energy sources like geothermal and hydro?

I'd actually prefer live in one of those shitholes than have the whole world die for what we've built here. Our grand society where still 1 in 4 children live in poverty. La-de-fucking-da. :rolleyes:

Because if everyone is in poverty, then noone is in poverty!

Sperg arguments about our position in the ladder aside, how does one reduce NZ's emissions, considering cow farts contribute almost half of our total emissions.

Get rid of the cows? Yea, nah.

Lets farm servers instead of cows! We'll power the servers by Hydro. A few flooded valleys aren't going to be missed.

It's probably too much to ask that we get by on less? Demand less cheap manufactured goods? No bugger to fight, so I guess it is too much to ask.

Food is cheap, shelter is cheap. The expensive part is maintaining the economy, making sure people don't get satisfied and lazy, stop producing value for the powerful.

.

No! No hydro! No ANYTHING! Only power generated by the good vibrations of peace, love and mungbeans is acceptable!

Hemp Power Stations ?

tidal power generators better than hydro, dump in middle of cook straight :P

We should move underwater. Build underwater habitats. Water rising? Good news! Cataclysmic cyclones? Who gives fuck!

Dethklok was right. Damn sight easier to access than Mars too.

But what about the Hectors Dolphins !

I would like it if the National government wasn't always actively hostile to public transport (thanks for ripping up those tramlines). Just fund the CRL for fucks sake.

tramlines?

I thought it was more like 75:25 CO2:CH4?

It's linked from that other wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ons_per_capita

Year 2000: 8.5 CO2 / 19.3 CO2 total equivalent.

<Some comment about Sweden>

Remember the fart tax? You know, the tax that was going to fund research into that very question. Stuff like different grass types, cow breeds, gut bacteria, other science things that we could do. Wonder what happened to that?

Sure but the green contingent only wants certain types of research to go ahead; the truly transformational types of research always get sabotaged by terrorists.

The sort of thing that will be truly transformational would be a cow that grows an extra eye fillet. Or maybe one where each leg tastes of a different animal.

Disease resistant potatoes are far beyond the limit of tolerance in NZ sadly.

John Key apologises... to Cameron Slater.

I guess we know where the balance of power lies in NZ, lolz...

Sabin resigns, byelection to come

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11394142

Good stuff and not a moment too soon.

Well, because National aren't a bunch of muppets, I assume that the resignation has been a done deal for a while and they were just waiting for the best time to announce it. Like, the split second after an opposition party leader announced he was quitting.

Insightful++

I hear there's rumours on the Internets

Ah man, give us a hint.

We need a guy like that kiwi guy in Aussie who always gets in trouble for breaching name suppression. That would save us all a lot of time.

Even he isn't being helpful right now.

Well at least we can trust the Herald to keep the story top of the page and as bold as can be. For a while there it was just the Russel Norman story sitting at number 3 on the top 5 list but I see that has now been rectified.

It's so surreal celebrating National's underhandedness as "aren't a bunch of muppets".

OMG, it just keeps getting better. And by better, I mean worse.

So this guy Sabin was National's chair on the Law & Order committee... and after John Key's wonderful "No comment. No comment. Uh, uh, uh, we're not commenting on that" it's clear Sabin is the guy facing charges. JK's "uh-uh-uh" being in response to the question did JK know Sabin might be facing these charges before the election.

National, the party that keeps on giving. And by giving, I mean taking.

What? That's not underhandedness, it's professionalism.

he would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for those pesky kids!

lolz, professionalism, cute.

A reminder of how Labour handles media timing:

http://forums.nzgames.com/showthread...56#post1856756