This is what "one person's misinformation is another person's fact" looks like in action:
National crisis centre set up to combat measles |
Wtaf.
|
I read a report in print saying it was advising children to neither enter or leave Auckland to contain the outbreak.
To be fair the article contradicts me: Quote:
|
Quote:
Note: I AM TOTALLY IN FAVOUR OF NANNY STATE IN THIS INSTANCE |
I guess it if you look to see where the measles outbreak is (South Auckland), then it's more likely to be due to other pressures/reasons that they are not vaccinated rather than some fucked up housewife you believes everything she reads.
But while my wife was vacinated when she was younger, thank fuck she stopped working at Manurewa High this year. |
Quote:
I understand there are those who believe all humans are infinitely capable and all actions can be reduced to choice. Those people are cunts, just saying. |
|
Quote:
Anti vaxxers associated with Midwives, huh. |
Whiplash breaking his silence with a petty dig at midwives, cause he met one he didn't like once.
|
|
Just to be clear, how certain are we of the justification for those unvaccinated?
I'll admit, I wanted to get on the anti-vaxxer bandwagon. But are we sure it isn't the desperate people bandwagon we need to be on? Could it be there's a third factor that results in both anti-vaxxers and desperate people? Like 10 years of the National government for instance? Or is it preferable to have a reason that we can pin on individuals for not being smart like us, rather than circumstances that are desperate? Edit: I'll read your link, see if I can summarise. |
So it seems like there's an existing vulnerability amongst poor people, so as they find things more difficult, they immunise less.
However in these circumstances, there is a factor additional to this existing vulnerability, as we can see that changes in immunisation rates that don't correlate with poverty. I'm struggling to make meaning of the results in the graph titled: "Immunisation rates have fallen across age groups since 2016". Especially the difference between 12, 18, and 24 month immunisations. Or why are immunisation rates for 5 year olds improving so dramatically these last years? |
|
Do I need to find a reputable source myself? I don't care for what the NZH's owners deem we should be told.
|
^ lol
|
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/healt...no-pay-concept
Nevermind this no jab no pay, just make it compulsory. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You're the one making sweeping assumptions without backing up a single thing, m8.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What the fuck? What are you trying to deflect from? Or you think I'm trying to protect Labour? Because I'm an avid Labour supporter, I've never got a word of criticism for the party? I know, I know, you've had your say, now tumbleweeds until the next time you want to make a dig then run away. Quote:
|
what the
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
The effort I am making here is to point out the NZH is trash and its motivation for the perspective it presents is NOT quality journalism.
As you point out, there are plenty of BETTER sources available. Why spread trash? |
|
Not hard, right?
I just don't get it. On hand we're all bashing on consumers of misinformation, yet here we are sharing one of the worst sources of misinformation. Worst in the sense it's essentially ostensibly a trusted news source. And now I get to point out Bridges' hypocrisy. |
Quote:
data: MoH Labour dropping that KPI upon taking office in 2018 seems to have worked well for the country. |
Glad we have no expert analysis on the data. Thinking their facts are better than anything I can cook up after my second wine in the evening.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
What can I say except, oh lol.
I wonder what we'll hear from Ab and pxpx. |
Yes, I remember when that bit of marketing was announced after the outcry about the dropping of targets altogether. Two years ago.
No "new measures" since then. Two years. Nothing. Quote:
I like that bit about "we won't break down our numbers into reports that the public can read and we won't publish those reports that we're not making anywhere". #mosttransparentgovermentever Reality: Labour has abolished health targets, and the country is worse-off because of it. |
Ooh, it's marketing. Gotcha mate.
Who got you so horny for National's health target? What glorious outcomes did National produce that makes you think what they had in mind must have surely been for the best of New Zealand? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Aha fuck you all I’m drinking now #greenvoter
|
All times are GMT +13. The time now is 17:46. |
Powered by Trololololooooo
© Copyright NZGames.com 1996-2024
Site paid for by members (love you guys)