999 call handlers told to stop calling people 'Sir' and 'Madam'
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ple-sir-madam/



Just a guess, but I reckon even the most sensitive transgender person calling 999 doesn't give a fuck what the operator calls them as long as help is on the way. Furthermore, I wonder if the majority of transgender people give a fuck about pronouns at all, emergency or no.

^^ literally worse than Hitler

∆∆ That's rich, coming from Hitler himself :mad: :mad:

... and this
Wish President Clinton a Happy 68th Birthday
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7pmnIitgeI

and the comment "The oddest thing is to conclude that Kevin playing Frank who plays Bill is more credible that Hillary trying to play herself."

... also odd that Clinton foundation still has this video up.

Looks like the snowflakes have taken over Cambridge as well:

https://quillette.com/2019/04/03/cam...rdan-peterson/

CAMBRIDGE.

^^

see also:

How Cambridge flunked the Peterson test
The University's shabby treatment of the psychology professor smacks of intellectual cowardice
https://unherd.com/2019/03/how-cambr...peterson-test/


Steve Jobs was right when he said during his commencement address "Fuck universities, and fuck your degree."

Ironically the best thing to counter his sermons is to shine a light on them.

That article took a lot of words to say HoW dArE yOu SiR?!

Good christ. It's going to take at least a week before I can get an erection again after seeing that.


Still tho...



Then don't look at it.

I'm confused

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-...money/11053280

Old gay drag queens are the enemy, stay woke everyone

https://quillette.com/2019/06/01/wat...acebook-video/

Thanks, I would not have received the memo otherwise. Helped me dodge a bullet there!

‘You can’t win without gay players,’ says USA’s World Cup hero Megan Rapinoe

Well that seems to have worked out well for them

Proctor and Gamble takes 8-billon-dollar write-down in value of Gillette business

I guess insulting the shit out of your target customers isn't a great strategy or something.

I think their share of the market has been declining for a while. But yeah, people are easily offended these days.

Dumb thing is the blindingly obvious intent of the ad wasn't to insult, but to challenge men to step up and take accountability for their own actions. From my own experiences I can see that wasn't going to work, too many take the easy way and as f_t said, take offense.

A triple capitulation to the LGBTQ taliban:
- A public apology for Gillette's role in creating the toxic masculinity that plagues planet earth
- A public disavowal of their target customer
- Gillette now chooses to associate their brand with beta males harrassing women and no one is enjoying themselves, rather than badass squarejaw fighter pilots who don't give beardrash to their hot girlfriends

Even after the mea culpa, Gillette will always be an infidel in the eyes of the Facebook status terrorists. The more Gillette asks "How can we make it all better?!" the more demands will be invented and expected of them.

Some chose to be offended. Those who weren't offended found the whole thing to be supremely unappealing and unsexy.

Bring back the fighter pilots and show me some 3D animations of hairs getting sliced by blades.

We must stay vigilant, there are transphobes and TERFs everywhere

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/shows...cis-women.html

I’m sure this will be entirely uncontroversial

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...imination.html

University chief bans all beef from campus in fight against 'climate change emergency'

Snowflake conservatives getting offended

Seriously?

Yeah on social media & radio plenty of Israel Falau comparisons and what if it said something supporting Fletchers type thing.

Nuff said

Amusing counterpoint

https://www.runnersworld.com/news/a2...rance-run-50k/

^
 

Oh fuck right off. First place male is just fucken 2nd place overall. Men don't need a special trophy. If I was the male that came 2nd overall in that event then I'd want a 2nd place award. Not a fucken tokenistic Aww But You're The First Male And Mum Still Thinks You're Special Award.

Fucks sake ::facepalm::




We need a 'choke yourself' emoji.

Richard Stallman just got cancelled

https://www.thedailybeast.com/famed-...tirely-willing

So he worked in MIT's AI lab? It's a good Bond villain backstory. Genius shunned by the community. Maybe he builds an AI to extract revenge on a backward society?

What's the PC gone made part? He seems to have some pretty dodgy opinions.

His attunement was off. You can't only be hyper-accurate at some things. You also need to be accurate-enough about everything else. Or your shit is liable to get fucked up.

Which is the point of this thread. In the modern era the sorts of opinions you have can end your professional life.

And he just resigned from MIT and FSF.

Is it an overreaction for his organisation to push him out though? I'm surprised he's lasted so long saying things like

Now read that quote (and all others by rms) assuming that the author is autistic and that every word in it has a very very strict definition that may be different from the one you assume to be the case.

Another postcard from spergville: rms seems to have regarded time spent travelling to a residence as wasted time that could otherwise be spent coding, so he slept on a mattress in his office at MIT, which was his legal address.

According to his SJW accuser the presence of said mattress is evidence that rms is a sexual predator.

Or he’s a nerd with no social skills who literally lives in his office. Oh noes, burn him.

Here's the absolute bestest argument for why Stallman should be unpersoned: he was violent towards students at MIT.

"Huh? In what way?"

When analysing the words 'sexual assault' with reference to one of Epstein's victims, Stallman said ""we can imagine many scenarios" including one in which the girl was coerced into faking consent.

Twitter mob reaction:
See? by referring to a thought exercise, in an email that could be read by women, Stallman did violence to those women. Therefore he's fired.

It does look like what he said was mischaracterised as he was talking in context of Minsky’s perspective of the situation. Minsky may have thought that the girl was older, and she may have presented as willing. In saying that his speculation here that this is “the most plausible scenario” does seem baseless. Also, he wasn’t expressing his opinion privately. He used a public mailing list to comment on a subject outside his sphere of expertise, knowing it was going to cause controversy (i.e regarding a 17yr old girl allegedly trafficked to an island to have sex with old men).

Surely there must be a threshold where an organisation can get rid of you if what you say publicly greatly harms their reputation by association? But what if that great harm is stirred up by a vocal minority? I do wonder if this would have escalated as much if Stallman didn’t have a history of defending paedophilia.

I think you're wrong on each of the three of the claims you make here (bolded).

1. It was a private mailing list for the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

2. It was exactly his sphere of expertise - he was lecturing people about the meanings of words. That's what he does. You know the phrase "Free as in speech, not free as in beer"? That's literally a quote from Richard Stallman. Stallman saw an announcement of a campus protest event and started breaking down what the words in the text of the announcement meant and implied; he wasn't disagreeing with the validity of the protest or the issue being protested. Check the first lines of the email that has ended his life:
He's talking about the words of the announcement, not about the event or the people or the things they did. He's giving a lecture to the readers on how language works.

3. He's a sperg with no social skills who neither knows nor understands how people are going to react to anything. This is a guy who while delivering a lecture to a hall full of people, in front of cameras, took off his footwear and started peeling loose skin off his toes and eating it while answering questions from the audience. It never entered his head that people might react in any sort of way because he's a fucking autistic mutant and his brain doesn't work like that and everyone who has ever met him knows that.

(Real world) True, but (ideal world) who the fuck cares? Stallman doesn't have a history of defending paedophlia, he has a history of not instinctively rejecting it without qualification. I've sat in expensive university courses* and bounced around exactly the same ideas that Stallman is being unpersoned for. What is paedophilia? Is it psychological attraction to child bodies, or a legal definition based on statute? Ages of consent are arbitrary and differ from place to place for no reason! issues like agency and harm and consent and personhood are all relevant (which is worse: healthy caring relationship with an emotionally stable and mature consenting 15-year-old, or abusive relationship with a mentally deficient immature 18-year old?)! What if a sex partner is a mature adult with a growth disorder and presents as pre-pubescent - is that paedophilia? Grownups can have these discussions without having their professional lives ended.


* lol if any of those philosophy lecturers are still on staff at the University of Waikato they must be shitting themselves

For a glimpse at what Richard Stallman would absolutely be like to deal with, please see: Sheldon goes to the Human Resources Department